Moral Positions
If your 15 year-old daughter found out she were pregnant, as a parent, would you support an abortion? What if your father had to be keep alive with tubes and machines? Do you want a ?designer baby?? If a criminal took the life of a family member, would you want him to die? All these life issues of abortion, euthanasia, genetic engineering, and capital punishment are very complex and controversial. Before researching, discussing, and debating these life issues in class, I never really took a stance or formed an opinion. I remained neutral because I recognized the pros and cons of the two sides of the argument. After reading chapter 13 (Reverence for Human Life), and the completing the all the life issue activities, I support the virtue of reverence for human life and agree with the ?consistent ethic of life.? We should hold human life as a sacred gift to be cared for by us until physical life reaches its natural end. I also agree with the church, who believes that all human life, from womb to tomb, is scared and therefore deserves protection and care. Lastly, God, not humankind, is responsible for life and death. With the complex issue of abortion, I am pro-life. I also feel that life begins with the first signs of
However, statistics show that murder rates are actually lower in the states where the death penalty is illegal. I believe that human cloning is immoral because it takes away the human dignity of the individual. Currently, scientists have almost completed the Human Genome Project, which maps the 23 pairs of human chromosomes and may reveal the roots and causes of many diseases. Although many people argue that life officially begins with conception, studies have shown that up to 50% of all fertilized zygotes may never implant along the walls in the uterus. If couples are physically and financially incapable of handling the pressures, they should give their child as a blessing to another able family. Even though almost half of the victims of murder in the U. In such cases, abortion not be allowed because the child should be treated as a gift from God and deserves the right to life. Despite potential problems and abuses, Pope John Paul II also believes that genetic manipulation aimed at healing disease is consistent with the Catholic moral tradition and promotes the personal well-being of man, without harming his integrity or worsening his life conditions. Executing the criminal will not always bring relief to the victims because capital punishment will not erase the grief or bring their loved ones back to life. Since the primary justification of the death penalty is to protect society, we can still keep society safe without resorting to violence, if we sentence these criminals to a lifetime jail, without the possibility of parole. With all four conditions, we would legalize passive, not active euthanasia. For example, each patient is entitled to food and water. What standards will geneticists use to base if a procedure is for therapy or enhancement since these topics are highly controversial? Do you consider blindness corrective or perfective although it is not life threatening? Do geneticists have the right to give treatment at their own discretion or patients have the ultimate say in proceeding with therapy or enhancement? I personally feel that trying to cure genetic diseases and potentially life-threatening illnesses are corrective. Capital punishment is also more expensive because of court costs and legal appeals.
Common topics in this essay:
Genome Project,
Paul II,
Supreme Court,
Lastly God,
,
Human Life,
capital punishment,
human life,
genetic engineering,
reverence human life,
reverence human,
gene therapy,
consistent ethic life,
people death row,
personally feel,
roe versus wade,
virtue reverence,
line interventions,
prolong life,
virtue reverence human,
human cloning,
|
Acceptance Essays
