Violence in the Media
Violence in the media and in the movies today is more gratuitous than it ever has been. Many experts have pointed out that society should take appropriate ethical actions to minimize violence by adolescents. Many believe that this violence was caused by the increased brutality in movies today. I feel that this is not the case; adolescents in our society are intelligent enough to distinguish between fake movie violence and unfeigned savagery. Many examples pointed out by the media that are depictions of gross and savage violence, such as the Columbine High School case, have other reasons behind the violence. Home lives and the influences of friends or parents are other causes behind many of these violent acts. I strongly feel that adolescents today can distinguish between what is right and wrong, what is fake and real. Most people in society agree that the movies today depict graphic and gory violence more often than movies of the past have. In a survey of American people, 89% agreed that it is important for movie producers to reduce the amount of violence in films. Only 11% disagreed with this statement, saying that the reduction of violence in the movies is not important at all. For instance, movies such as the 1990
However, this trend of violence in the movies and the media does not mean that there is an increasing trend of violence in adolescents. Finally, society does not need to take appropriate ethical actions to stop this increasing trend in violence- it is the responsibility of the parents involved in the case of violence to remedy the situation. action thriller Die Hard where Bruce Willis' character kills 264 people, all in front of the camera push the envelope of movie violence. Movies such as Die Hard, where Bruce Willis' character kills 264 people in front of the camera, show unnecessary and savage violence. Movies do not contribute to violent acts in adolescents. " This shows that many Americans are ready for films without gratuitous violence. Most if not all adolescents realize that the violence in movies is fake and scripted violence, and can distinguish between fantasy and real-world violence. In response to the ill-timed release of the movie "Hardball," director Brian Robbins told Variety Magazine, "It's hard to say, `Go see a movie,' but it sort of feels like if you are going to want some entertainment, ("Hardball" is) a movie to see. Home lives are important influences upon adolescents in that many adolescents that have been abused as children are more likely to commit violent acts by age 30 than others who have never been abused. These sources are much more readily accessible to adolescents than the R-rated and NC-17 rated movies. These people felt persecuted by their peers, and felt that their peers consistently made fun of them and alienated them from many if not all social situations. After the episode of unprovoked terror on September 11, 2001, Americans are more closely bonded than ever. Violence in the movies and the media is getting more and more bloody and frequent. Other factors such as influences upon the aggressor by other people and home life and possible abuse present themselves more often than does movie violence in these cases. Other factors than movie violence in extreme cases of violence are main contributors to the violent acts.
Common topics in this essay:
Magazine It's,
Columbine School,
Bruce Willis',
Ratings NC-17,
,
R-rated NC-17,
Glass House,
violence movies,
violent acts,
Little League,
movie violence,
Hardball Columbia's,
Brian Robbins,
home lives influences,
lives influences,
violence adolescents,
ethical actions,
appropriate ethical,
adolescents adolescents,
home lives,
columbine school,
appropriate ethical actions,
bruce willis' character,
willis' character kills,
character kills 264,
|
Acceptance Essays
