To Trust or Not to Trust, Cred
In the article "Video Surveillance: Invasion of privacy or reasonable response to misconduct?" found on the Emond-Harnden website, an argument is posed for the reader. The content of this argument is of great import to the read, but something possibly more significant is the credibility of the website. In essence, can the information this website provides be trusted enough to direct people in their lives and sway their opinions in the way of the argument. There are many parts of an argument that must be evaluated first, before the argument can be valued as credible. According to Browne and Keeley of their book Evaluating Online Resources "Healthy doubt is [a] positive self-defense" (24) when it comes to evaluating an argument and its credibility. Anyone has the ability to write a website, but for that information to be admitted as credible the author must be first established as trustworthy. Many questions must be asked about the author to establish their credibility, and seeing as how this article is written by "Emond-Harnden", the credibility of a whole company must be established. Emond-Harnden is a law firm that litigates for unions as well as the companies that employ them in labor disputes as well as other troubles.
In conclusion, this article, although slightly biased by their values, claims, and motives, can be considered a credible and reputable source for information regarding the legality of video surveillance. In this case, the authors of the site provide an example of a rebuttal within their argument even before one is officially said. IWA-Canada, Local 1-92-4,and Richardson v. There are many motives within argument, but almost always a few main ones are found. These examples include a British Columbia court case, the case Kimberly-Clarke Inc. A striking example of the author's claim to credibility is the inclusion of the last court case; in this case, video taped evidence was declared admissible even though Richardson, the plaintiff, claimed that it was an infringement on his rights. One or more of these values may apply to reader's of the website, but through the appeal and writing of the material, a bias towards these values is soon seen. In one can perform an analysis such as this upon all of the arguments that one encounters then many a painful headache can be avoided when a non-credible website or argument is encountered. All authors make assumptions about their own values and the values of their readers, first through their argument, then through their examples. For an argument to be convincing at all one must have motives and reasons as to why they support or disavow a certain topic. This forward thinking is essential for a website to be accepted credible be even the most stringent of readers. " (5) This open-ended statement that hopefully makes the reader feel like they need legal counsel and since Edmond-Harden provided this information, who better to provided the reader legal counsel? The advocacy standpoint of this website The motives supporting an argument are paramount to establishing the argument and its credibility, but very few things can sway a reader's opinion other than the examples and evidences presented by the writers of the argument.
Common topics in this essay:
Nancy Wood,
Resources Healthy,
Industries Ltd,
Surveillance Invasion,
video surveillance,
credibility website,
establish credibility,
British Columbia,
Kimberly-Clarke Inc,
Browne Keeley,
reader's opinion,
website argument,
ethical argument,
argument examples,
IWA-Canada Local,
,
article video surveillance,
examples argument,
argument credibility,
admissibility video surveillance,
court case,
credibility admissibility video,
|
Acceptance Essays
