I just don't get it. Someone please enlighten me on the hype that is TNA. People complain about WWE so much and praise TNA so highly. When I look at WWE I see a well produced, organized, solid show. When I look at TNA is see two minute matches, poorly built up wrestlers going to the top, a bombardment of ads for future events playing six times each, randomly placed highlights that make me wonder if I'm watching something from this week or the last, and so much bullshit that people complain about WWE for having. Oh, by the way, welcome to The 5 Star Truth!
             With that introduction aside, let's talk wrestling. What do people complain about with WWE? Poorly built stars, bad gimmicks, no storylines, too many old people coming back and taking the young guys' spotlights, bad wrestling, bad pay-per-views, too many people with not enough time to promote themselves, Triple H remaining the World Champ for way too long, and guys like Benoit, Jericho, and Guerrero winning the Heavyweight title and immediately being shoved out of the title hunt when they lose it. Well, guess what, TNA isn't a damn bit better and it's even worse in fact. Then why do people love it so much you ask? Well for starters, TNA is the underdog. Everyone loves watching something grow and rise to the top. Then when it does reach the top they love to watch it fail and even fight for it to happen, which is what the fans are doing with WWE right now. TNA is a little promotion with some promise to it and can be seen on a national level. That definitely appeals to a lot of people. But better than WWE? I don't think so.
             So people complain about the aforementioned problems in WWE, but TNA is not free of these faults either. Look at Monty Brown. Wow, he's another black wrestler who chose a cat theme for his attire just like Orlando Jordan and Ernest Miller, real unique. He cuts promos like a Tough Enough wannabe and has worse flexibility tha
             ...