Terrorism
Today, America is faced with a challenging question: What is to be done about terrorism? There are not easy answers to this question. There are many options and methods to dealing with terrorists that the United States has used in the past. At times we have been successful in our efforts and at others we have failed. In Sun Tsu's book The Art of War, he writes know your enemy, this is the most effective strategy in battle. But does America really know its enemy? Certainly, we have seen pictures of Osama Bin Laden and Yasir Arafat, and we associate them with terror. But these photographs are merely images of evil; they are not the basis of our struggle. To truly understand what we are dealing with we must understand the root of their motives: we must understand terror. To do this we must explore the definition of the word it self, what does it mean and what are the characteristics of terrorism. Then we can trace the historical evolution of terror throughout history starting with the French revolution and ending in the present day. From there we can discuss the motives behind the violence, what leads these groups to such fanatical means and what was their desired goal. In doing this we can more clearl
The United States has a long-standing policy not to cooperate with terrorist demands, to try and bring them to justice and to apply pressure to states that harbor and sponsor terrorists. The movement was known as the 'regime of the Terror' and was led by Maximilien Robespierre. Then, focus on some of groups and their ideological motives, namely religious groups, leftists groups and state terror in Nazi Germany. The two ideas above are drastically different and strongly oppose each other. He also says that terrorist situations should be evaluated individually as they differ from one time to the next and a universal solution is not practical. Pillar believes that this is an inefficient way to view the problem. Later, the Noonday Volga, a Russian resistance group, used a hand delivered bomb to assassinate Tsar Alexander II (Hoffman 19). The people themselves do not believe they are terrorists, they prefer 'freedom fighter' or 'liberator'. They employ violence in order to gain negotiating rights and political strength. From the illogical point of view, he was a man obsessed with power and exerted punishment over his people merely because he was in a position to do so. We might say that terrorism is a group of people with a common political, religious, or economic ideology who employ illegal violence or the threat of violence as a tactic to intimidate an objective audience in order to meet their goals. Was this a logical choice or was it a psychological imbalance within Hitler, which lead him to these extreme means? Logically speaking, Hitler's motives were that he wanted to remain in power uncontested and therefore coerced the people of Germany into not opposing him. It has a long and violent history that has taken many forms over the years. There are a number of definitions for a word, which applies to some many different forms of violence and excludes so many others.
Common topics in this essay:
American Department,
Policy Pillar,
Weatherman United,
Namely Pillar's,
Yasir Arafat,
Nazi Germany,
Jerrold Post,
Shinrikyo Japanese,
According Pillar,
Soviet Union,
pillar believes,
religious terror,
religious political,
french revolution,
violent acts,
weapons mass destruction,
threat violence,
pillar suggests,
cold war,
violence threat,
weapons mass,
de la terreur,
cooperate terrorist demands,
dealing terrorists united,
pillar believes simple,
|
Acceptance Essays
