What's Wrong with This Picture
Mark Crispin Miller's article titled "What's Wrong with This Picture" provides his rebuttal against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and their recent relaxation in its rules regarding media ownership. Claims that few giant corporations are taking over the nation's more independent labels, American ideals are being swept aside, and that the government is buying into these ideas constitute Miller's main allegations against the FCC. Many of Miller's arguments against the FCC's laid-back regulations are valid, however that does not mean they are necessarily a bad thing. Several of Miller's protests also serve as the backbone of any media that he along with the rest of the public receives.Large media corporations are slowly becoming giant monopolies as they take over other smaller companies. These huge firms continue growing larger while the smaller
Miller proposes that with these few corporations running the entire media, there is less room for diversity and competition among all the different companies. It has now become predictable that a sister network will nonchalantly promote their other channels' television programs, hoping to sway more viewers. Also, the US Supreme Court refused to hear a case regarding the FCC and dropping its rule on preventing any one company from serving more than thirty percent of US cable subscribers. " If Miller defines public interest as the people needing to know everything pertaining to our lives and liberty and happiness, how do we define the provisions of liberty and happiness?The government continues to buy into these giant monopolies. Miller claims that these companies completely disregard the public's interest so long as they are satisfying the needs of their greater corporations. But, who is given the right to define "public interest. When The Telecommunications Act of 1996 had outlawed in 1975 that a single company could own a daily paper and a TV station in the same market, this same idea recently came back into discussion to "review" the last few rules that prevented a perfect oligopoly. Yet, look at present examples, news companies such CNN, MSNews, and FOXnews dominate primetime readers and will continue to do so, why would the people of America rely onThe few cartels are working against the American ideals of democracy and public interest in order to satisfy their "mother" corporations. Through Miller's support and claims that many media companies are being overtaken by mega corporations, it provides a stance that the people of American should fight against this and stand for their rights of democracy. Miller tries to persuade his readers by using more pathos elements in regards to how the FCC is denying their determined rights as citizens of the United States. This results in the few corporations vying for all of the public's attention and trying to use the same tactics as their competing networks. Yet, these claims also provide evidence that since these huge corporations are receiving the viewing standards well above expectations and being used by the people, they must be doing something right and why would they want to stop more business? The support provided by Miller helps clarify his claims, but obviously these corporations are fulfilling some public interest goals if the people of American continue watching. , independent companies are beginning to diminish and sink into them. Miller also claims that the relationship between this oligopoly is in good standing with the White House since they do not reveal the faults and crimes, so of course the federal government will allow them to continue as they are.
Common topics in this essay:
MSNews FOXnews,
FCC Miller's,
White House,
Commission FCC,
Telecommunications Act,
Supreme Court,
Wrong Picture,
Crispin Miller's,
people american,
liberty happiness,
miller claims,
giant monopolies,
american ideals,
|
Acceptance Essays
