Why Cloning Shouldn't Be Banned
Early in 1997 Scottish scientist Dr. Ian Wilmot revealed to the world that he had successfully cloned an entire adult sheep. Dolly was the young clone's given name. With this announcement the world made a collective gasp at the realization that no longer was cloning a pipe dream or an element of science fiction movies. Immediately, cloning became one of the most debated topics in the world. From the school house to the White House discussions began regarding the ethical implications of cloning. Those in favor of cloning argue that the technology will eventually lead to numerous benefits for humankind. Benefits such as infertility clinics to assist reproductively challenged couples in having genetically related children, the growing and healing of wounded or diseased tissues and organs, the curing of diseases such as cancer and leukemia, and possibly the cloning of important historical figures such as scientists, politicians, and artists are all claims made by proponents of cloning. Conversely, opponents of cloning say that it is immoral and unethical to clone human beings for both religious and humanitarian reasons. Their arguments are very thoughtful and concerned ideas, such as the fear that cloning will lead to the "10,000 Hi
This could also lead to diagnosis and prevention of, or even the creation of resistance to diseases such as cancer or AIDS (Dumesic 1). Just like the 10,000 Hitlers these clones would have their own minds and wills. Vere, like many others, argues that the cloning would allow the "re-birth" of exceptional or important historical figures of science, politics, and entertainment. Afterwards, the embryo develops into a fetus and is born after nine months, just like any other baby (Dumestic 1). Then, the cell is manipulated into believing that it has been fertilized and is then implanted into the womb of the mother just as is done in the process of in vitro fertilization. Richard Seed that he would open a fertility clinic in either the United States or Mexico by 1999 to help infertile couple using cloning. It is possible through cloning to grow "spare parts" to be used in organ transplants. There are several practices that are not allowed by various religions, yet they are not outlawed. This is a possibility, but there are thousands of identical twins born naturally every day around the world. However, the majority of these arguments are not based on science or logical reason and are therefore easily open to criticism. Studies have shown that identical twins who are raised apart often share similar personalities and intelligence, even though they possessed entirely different experience and background (Vere 3). Religious diversity in America alone is too great to justify one sector determining the lawfulness or morality of anyone else's beliefs. " This might be a valid argument if every person in the world shared the same religious beliefs and even believed in God. For example, a heart or a kidney could be grown outside of the body to be used in organ transplants without fear of rejection from the recipient's body, eliminating the need for anti-rejection drugs (Nash 1). While the clones of these people would not be like the originals in every way it is believed that their capacity for intelligence would be as great if not greater.
Common topics in this essay:
Michael Jordan,
White House,
Nuclear Substitution,
United Mexico,
Yuk Factor,
Albert Einstein,
AIDS Dumesic,
Ian Wilmot,
Vere Exceptional,
identical twins,
Richard Seed,
10000 hitlers,
evil dictators,
fear cloning,
own child,
10000 hitlers scenario,
cloning selfish,
funny feelings,
nucleus cell,
human life,
technical language,
female egg cell,
technical language cloning,
|
Acceptance Essays
