When Does Obedience to Authori
To what degree does maintaining obedience to authority lead to aggressive or violent behavior? After reading The Lottery and The Stanford Prison Experiment, I believe that I can answer this question, as both passages helped me develop analogies on this subject by comparing their concepts with real life situations. While they are both very different situations and have extremely unique concepts, they have demonstrated similar answers to me. Even though something may not be morally right to someone, a manipulative figurehead or situation can easily force someone to go against his or her beliefs. There are many real life situations involving this subject.Everyday people are forced to go against their beliefs for one reason or another. For example, someone who performs or writes a certain type of music that he or she loves, and has based his or her career around is offered a record deal. The problem is that record company wants him or her to change their style. If they don't, then they won't get the deal. This is a situation where they are forced to be obedient to authority. In some situations, the artist may have to change their style to a more corrupt or violent style then they are used to. This is just one of many examples and ap
When their privileges were taken away, they knew that complying by the rules would at least help get some of them back. These are just a few situations that show how being obedient to authority can lead to aggressive or violent situations. This is very similar to how some of the mock prisoners behaved in The Stanford Prison Experiment. There was a large rebellion the second day by the mock prisoners against the mock guards. This is an example of how people can use religion to get people to do what they want. (Jackson, 2000) In The Stanford Prison Experiment, it was the money that was to be paid to the participants that intrigued them the most. I could compare this situation to parts of The Lottery. Even though it really wasn't right, it was a tradition that people didn't want to question. 311, 2000) While many of the soldiers probably did not like it, they had to follow the orders of their commander. (Jackson, 2000) In war, soldiers are forced to kill whether they like it or not. They couldn't really speak out against it though because if they did, they would be ridiculed by the most of the other townsfolk. This shows that money can easily affect people's obedience to authority. They think that by not participating will cause the rest of the group to reject them. Money is a main influence in joining the armed forces, and is an influence in other areas of life as well. When the prisoners realized that behavior like that would only worsen their situation, they started to follow the rules again.
Common topics in this essay:
Prison Experiment,
Bin Laden,
Behrens Rosen,
,
stanford prison,
Stanford Prison,
stanford prison experiment,
prison experiment,
obedience authority,
violent behavior,
lead aggressive violent,
authority lead,
jackson 2000,
aggressive violent,
lead aggressive,
obedient authority,
Experiment Lottery,
real life situations,
aggressive violent behavior,
obedient authority lead,
life situations,
|