Executive and Legislative Powers
The Executive and Legislative powers of all three NAFTA countries share similarities and differences in their internal relationships. They are fundamentally the highest branches of government for law, policy making and many other roles that heavily influence the every day lives of their citizens. Unlike the United States and Mexico which have adapted democratic systems, Canada governs using a parliamentary style of government This is somewhat essential to the main differences of Canada's relationship between the executive and legislative branches and those relationships of the United States and Mexico. The relationships and powers between these seemingly separate branches are as distinct as the culture's of these nations. As we examine the legislative and executive branches of these nations we see how the placement and displacement of power have greatly influenced their ability to initiate change. The relationship between the executive branch and legislature often influence the decision making abilities of government and vary between the nations of NAFTA in a way that somewhat reflect their different cultures. Canada's parliamentary government is distinguished from the other NAFTA
Of the executive branch the Prime Minister has the least amount of power. The executive branch is comprised essentially of two parts. For such support the executive might request a member's commitment or support for the same in return. This is somewhat different than the relationships in Canada and Mexico as we see the executive without any type of absolute or centralized power. In Mexico we see many of the same relationships between the legislative and executive branches of government. Thus to gain support for an administration we see "negotiation" as our new tool for policy making. The roles and relationships of the executive and legislative branches in the three NAFTA countries differ most noticeable in their roles for legislation. Congress: Which party is in the majority? What is the dominant congressional view of the presidency? Of the role of Congress?" (p130)The separation of power in the United States is unique and is reflected in how the executive and legislative branches work together to pass legislation. It is with this concept that we see their relationships. Ultimately the Monarch or Queen has the greatest influence in the Canadian government which allows her consent to play a major role in the relationship within the executive and with the legislature. His responsibilities are to represent his party and monarch as well addresses any questions in the House of Commons as well meet in official foreign delegations. In the United States we see an intentional "balance of power" between these two branches. This again is due in large part to party loyalty and majority.
Common topics in this essay:
United Mexico,
Branches American,
Monarch Mexico,
Prime Minister,
Canada Mexico,
Prime Minster,
Mexico Legislative,
Senate United,
Executive Legislative,
Mexico Democratic,
executive branch,
executive legislative,
prime minister,
executive legislative branches,
legislative branches,
legislative branch,
branches government,
party loyalty,
majority party,
relationship executive,
chamber deputies,
canada mexico executive,
ability initiate change,
influence legislative branch,
relationships executive legislative,
|
Acceptance Essays
