Atomic Bomb....Was it neccessa
August 6th, 1945, 70,0000 lives were ended in a matter of seconds. The United States had dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. Today many argue whether or not the U.S. should have taken such a drastic measure. Was it entirely necessary that we drop such a devastating weapon? To answer that first we must look at was going on in the world at the time of the conflict. The U.S. had been fighting a massive war since 1941. Moral was most likely low, and resources were at the same level as moral. Still both sides continued to fight and both were determined to win. Obviously the best thing that could have possibly happened would have been to bring the war to a quick end with a minimum of allied casualties. Harry Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb was entirely warranted and was in the best interest of Americans and the world. Three factors should be considered to fully realize this. First, what would have happened should we have not dropped the bomb? Would WWII have ended shortly afterwards without nuclear arms-not likely. Secondly we must consider the Japanese people's extreme dedication to their country and emperor, willing to give up their own lives without thinking to stop the
While there are still many who would argue the cruelty of nuclear weapons, it is apparent that Harry S. Also Truman threatens to utilize the A-bomb's power again until we are victorious. If one wanted to argue the issue of radiation as a side effect of atomic bombing, they would have to find a way to argue the side effects of bombing altogether. The moral issue of dropping the bomb is very controversial. Also it appeared that a longer war is exactly what Japan had in mind. In the following quote taken from a radio address of the time Harry S. A Japanese army slogan of the time was "To die for the emperor is to live forever. By examining the climate of the world at the time of war, and given all other alternatives, the United States had no choice but to drop the bomb. How can anyone be certain that Japan would have continued to fight? It is possible that they were preparing for surrender, no one can say for certain exactly what would have happened but by examining evidence of Japanese culture and warfare it is obvious that would not have been the case. Think about what must be on that pilot's mind. Once on Japanese soil our boys would have had to face off with arguably the most dedicated and fiercest warriors the world has known, willing to sacrifice their lives and those of their families for their emperor and country. In addition to civilian's dedication to their country, there was a group of military pilots called the Kamikaze. Lastly the morality of nuclear bombing must be explored. " It was not considered a sacrifice to die for your country; it was considered an honor and your duty.
Common topics in this essay:
Harry Truman,
Kamikaze Kamikaze,
Harry Truman's,
Hiroshima Nagasaki,
BombWas August,
Truman American,
Vietnamese Japanese,
Jusshi Reisho,
Hiroshima Nagasaki-,
atomic bomb,
drop bomb,
harry truman,
Atomic BombWas,
atom bomb,
continued fight,
die emperor,
devastating weapon,
dedication country,
decision drop,
japanese military,
|
Acceptance Essays
