Military Intervention in Afgha
Justification for retaliation against acts of hatred proves to be very difficult to develop, maintain, and most of all prove. The September 11th assault that "was so sudden and so shocking that it seemed to obliterate many of the doubts that were the legacy of the country's tortured Vietnam experience. Polls show that up to 90% of Americans support a military response," wrote Mark Barabak. However was this support justified? Would a military response that would destroy yet another nation be moral? That would tear apart families, leave orphans, and spawn more hatred and vengeance? I believe that not only does the current military intervention in Afghanistan do all this but it creates other damages to nations other than Afghanistan nor does it account for the lives lost in the battle that is supposedly between right and evil, but rather in my eyes, evil and those who want to get back at evil. The pulverizing of a battred country just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of innocent civilians have already been killed by U.S. bombing in pursuit of Osama bin Laden. The Pentagon has confirmed numerous instances of "collateral damage," including a 2,000-pound bomb that struck a residential area near Kabul. Th
As always, women and children will be among the prncipal victims of the war, and also of the reinforcement of masculinity and patriarchal attitudes and structures, that the ideology of war always brings with it. By the principles of our criminal law, they are therefore just as culpable for these deaths as they would be if innocents were targeted. com)This theory applies very readily to the bombings in Afghanistan. " Among the targets so far are airports, communication facilities, electrical plants, government buildings, houses - all attacked for a political prpose. During their brief time in power from 1992 to 1996, the Northern Alliance (New York Times Editorial) scored poorly in the peaceful governance and human rights departments. The government's arbitrary power to arrest, detain, harass and punish on grounds of mere suspicion, can then be used against all kinds of peoples' movements legitimately mobilizing and opposing government policies of various kinds. 5 million will leave their homes, risking mass starvation in the brutal Afghan winter to escape the bombings. They are likely to kill again if they are able to retake the country. (Karon)If the Northern Alliance takes power, experts predict a new flood of heroin across the globe. They remember a series of broken Western promises, most recently when the United States and its allies didn't provide much-needed development assistance in the early 1990s. (Newsweek Editorial I can't Find to put in my bibliography)The Indian government for example endorsed this coalition. After being pushed out of power, they became unlikely allies, and it is obvious that if they ever gain power again, they will start fighting and killing each other again.
Common topics in this essay:
India Times,
Nuremberg Charter,
Northern Alliance,
Afghans Pakistan,
Otherwise Pakistani,
Pakistanis Afghans,
Afghanistan Let's,
Quetta Kurtz,
Geneva Conventions,
Mark Barabak,
northern alliance,
military intervention,
civilian objects,
criminal law,
bombing campaign,
people afghanistan,
collateral damage,
osama bin laden,
justified military,
fight terrorism,
bin laden,
|
Acceptance Essays
