The Relationship between Unilateralism and Multiculturalism in the United States Foreign Policy
             Now that the world has gone into the 21st century, the theme of globalism and world peace has become stronger than ever before. The world has become a smaller place with the inventions of fast transportation and fast communication such as telephones and internet. There has never been a better chance to unite the world. Instead, as years pass by, the world is facing deeper and deeper separation because of one superpower that seems as if it is going to take over the world in the near future. Why is this happening? The answer is unilateralism and multiculturalism in the U.S. society and the government. Unilateralism being the doctrine a nation should conduct their foreign affairs individualistically without the advice or involvement of other nations, and multiculturalism being the doctrine that several different cultures (rather than one national culture) can co-exist peacefully and equitably in a single country. In this report, I would like to write about the relationship between the unilateralism and the multiculturalism that lies in the U.S. government and how it affects the world.
             Since the Cold War conclusion, American unilateralism has become evident. The terminology of unilateralism was started being used from the time of the Clinton administration, relating to the circumstance that America reigned in worldwide politics as a superpower. Although unilateralism existed in the Clinton administration, they were more concerned about the cooperative relationship with the ally countries so the thought of unilateralism did not reach up to where it is now. When the Bush administration appeared, it reached to the point where unilateralism was pursued extensively. This became the American basis principle which said for America to assemble all policies based on its self-interests, and with this, the relationship with its allies was going to be...