The origins of the World War I can be directly traced to the shifting balance of power in Europe, and the rational responses of the major powers in regards to their respective security dilemmas. The end of the 19th century introduced Europe to a power struggle defined by multi-polarity. With the absence of a clear hegemony, or dominant political, economic and military power, Europe was left highly unstable. This instability threatened the security of every European nation, and the popular solution was the establishment of mutual defense agreements. These alliances included Germany siding with ailing Austria-Hungary, while France found an unlikely ally in the rapidly improving Russia. The major powers had now begun a destructive arms race with a future destined for crisis. This pressure of multi-polarity eventually became too great and the states succumbed to the strain of their security dilemmas with mobilization the result.
This essay will first fuse a theoretical and historical account of the Great War and explain that it was the result of Germany’s preventative motivation to halt the Russian Empire's invariable rise and bid for hegemony. Germany looked to obtain the hegemonic status bef
. . .
A chance was given to Germany to localize the conflict but it was denied and this choice resulted in 37 million casualties. Evidence shows that years of work in formulating, amending, and improving ones plans creates a psychological obligation to it. While Kaiser Wilhelm never wanted a Great War, the structural factors of his inflexible military prevented him from attaining his one-front battle with Russia. However, Germany pushed Austria to set an unreasonable ultimatum on Serbia, giving the country only 48 hour to respond. On July 27, as the escalation was at a fervor pitch, the Russian foreign minister Sergei Sazonov telegrammed Berlin asking “looking for a way out” to avoid world war and called up Germany to act as mediator. Doyle explains that states have a strong preference for power as a means to security and only the rational and power-seeking will survive the competition to survive. Lastly, the essay will outline the certain structural factors that guaranteed war in 1914 by illustrating how inflexible mobilization in an anarchic Europe created the most destructive crisis the world had ever seen. Without hegemony in Europe, nervous alliances were created to maintain a balance of power and as structural realists explain, any anarchical situation among states creates a strong drive and search for power in order to be in the advantageous position.
World War I could have been avoided. ” German leaders recognized that with their power at its peak, preventative war was the only option to stop Russia’s rapid military augmentation. However, with Germany’s increased dominance, the Austrian’s now had the confidence to punish Serbia. ” This quote exemplifies how the mobilization of armies was almost synonymous for war in 1914, and this was what Germany wanted. Germany knew that even partial mobilization of Russian soldiers would allow them to escalate the conflict. An illustration of this would be Germany’s increased spending on its navy due to its increase in industrialization.
Approximate Word count =
2048
Approximate Pages =
8 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|