Sex offenders are deeply disturbed individuals, whether they are disabled intellectually or mentally healthy, and there are many ways in which these people are being monitored through a series of probation and parole tactics. The representation of sex offender crimes is documented in many statistics that are found in current research. There are also studies that have been done to illustrate the impact of these sexual assaults against their helpless victims. Certain characteristics, background, and the environment in which the offender was raised all contribute to their eventual sexual offenses. Although many researchers have noted that once a sex offender always a sex offender, there are still treatment programs that are trying to rehabilitate the offender and successfully reintegrate that person back into their former community, even though this process can be complex at times.
Sex offenders emerged as the ultimate dangerous criminal class in the 1990’s. They appeared to be the criminal justice “issue of the year in that decade, and as a category of offenders, they were among the highest priority for the criminal justice system to manage and contain” (Lynch, 2002: 529). Toward the end of the ninet
. . .
The effects of the Wisconsin community “not-statute authorizes officials to alert residents about the release and reintegration of sex offenders in their community as perceived by residents, law enforcement, probation/parole agents, and sex offenders” (“Sex Offender Community,” 2000: 2). For each convicted offender in a prison or jail there are nearly three offenders under probation or parole supervision in the community (“Sex Offenses,” 1997). The NCVS gathers information about crime and its consequences “from a nationally representative sample of United States residents age 12 or older about any crimes they may have experienced whether or not the crime was reported to a law enforcement agency” (“Sex Offenses,” 1997: 1). In addition, “multiple family pathology, gross marital disharmony, parental separation, violence, neglect, and poor control” are characteristics of the home environment (Lindsay et al. Lund (1990) in a study of 93 intellectually disabled patients on statutory care orders reported a reoffending rate of 72 percent over ten years (Lindsay et al.
Overall, there are several ways that sex offenders are being handled. The Weiterung Act was soon “amended by the passage of Megan’s Law in 1996, which requires states to make sex offender registry information available to the public” (Sample & Bray, 2003: 60). Some states introduced chemical castration and reintroduced execution as possible punishments for sex crimes (Sample & Bray, 2003).
Characteristics of Sex Offenders and Reoffending Rates
A researcher, Day, notes some characteristics of sex offenders include “sexual naivety, an inability to understand normal sexual relationships, lack of relationship skills, difficulty in mixing with the opposite sex, poor impulse control, and susceptibility to the influence of others” (Lindsay et al. 5 years to 5 years raising the sentenced served from 38 percent to 50 percent” (“Sex Offenses,” 1997: 20).
Approximate Word count =
2164
Approximate Pages =
9 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|
