After reading the story of Edgar Allan Poe, many debates happened between classmates of Robert's 8:30 class. Many students think that the killer is not guilty and other think that he's. Some say that he is crazy and that's why he acted like that. Other say that we can accept man like that in today's society. But the big question is: Is the narrator guilty or not? There are two possible answers to this question: yes or no. My answer to this question is yes, he's guilty. I have many reasons to support my thesis. The first reason is that the murder admitted is crime to the police officer and wrote down all his acts. Another reason that proves that he's guilty is the fact that he killed his friend without any valid reason. He also had his plan in mind since a couple of day. His acts were premeditated and that's make him a guilty man.
             First, he is guilty because he admitted his crime. He wrote down on paper how he killed his friend. If you read his paper, you will see every steps of his thinking in the process of killing the old man. When the policeman came to the house, he also admitted his crime by oral. He showed to the officers where the body of the old man was. If he didn't kill the old man, why did he write down this entire story and why did he tell the police that he killed his friend? Everything that he said or wrote down can be prove because he hided the body of the old man under the floor of the house. The fact that he admitted his crime makes him a guilty man.
             Second, he had no valid reason to kill the old man. Even if the old had an "Evil Eye",
             the man didn't have to kill him just because he is fear by his eye. The fact that he doesn't like his eye his not a good reason to kill the man. The old man's eye made the killer crazy. The narrator's guilt over killing the old man forces him to believe that he heard the dead man&
             ...