Affirmative Action in the College Admissions Process

Affirmative action in the collegiate admissions process is primarily based upon race. For example,

. . .
And while ranking occupations might seem hopelessly complex, various attempts to do so objectively have yielded remarkably consistent results. We need minorities, through the use of affirmative action, to gain entry into these networks to attain those high positions that are being monopolized. This factor, in accordance with past and present educational injustices, will keep the policy of affirmative action in existence as long as these types of injustices are performed against minorities. This isolation is due to discrimination not only within the college admissions process but also in the work environment: the glass ceiling. Also by utilizing a class based system, there will just as much a cause of resentment amongst the people left out as with the race-based system. Being from a school that was thrity-five percent minority, I know what it’s like to have to work a little bit harder.

Schools across the nation are looking at, if not already in the act of, eliminating race-based preferences in the admissions process. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 put the policy of prevention against minorities in the federal programs, public facilities, and the workplace. The major issue that has risen since it has begun is whether or not the students who gain entry actually merit entry when compared with their contemporaries. Ferguson, there would not be any footholds in modern society for minorities to advance and attain higher education. An example: student A was ranked in the top third of his class, student B in the bottom third. Finally, everyone from Dan Quayle to Donna Shalala agrees that children growing up in single-parent homes have a tougher time. In particular, if we look back at slavery, we see these Lockean laws being violated. Affirmative action is geared towards making business, government, and higher education institutions resemble America; in that this land is very diverse and so must the various establishments within this country.

Common topics in this essay:
Bush Talented, Levis People, Rights Act, Georgia SAT, Donna Shalala, College Board, Civil War, Ceiling Commission, affirmative action, Homer Plessy, University Florida, race-based affirmative, race-based affirmative action, civil rights, admissions process, policy affirmative, civil rights act, rights act, glass ceiling, lack minority presence, class based, minorities affirmative, minority presence, glass ceiling commission, rights act 1964,

Approximate Word count = 2275
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here