Hate Crimes
Hate crimes are basically crimes committed against another person because of his or her race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, etc. Congress passed a law that gives people guilty of hate crimes a larger sentence. I'm against hate crime laws because they make people's thoughts and beliefs illegal, and that goes against the First Amendment of the Constitution, freedom of religion and freedom of speech. So, the courts believe that murdering someone while saying racist remarks is worse then murdering someone while saying nothing at all. The First Amendment protects everyone, even people who say stuff that is stupid or that we don't agree with. Actually, all crimes are hate crimes because you must hate someone to commit a crime against them. Hate crimes are really just punishment for politically incorrect
"Hate crime laws could have prevented the Holocaust" -George Pataki. Defendant pled guilty to two counts of second-degree possession of a firearm for an unlawful purpose and possession of a prohibited weapon. " -Neal BoortThis was a big hate crime case: State v. " He further argued that the statute unconstitutionally allows imposition of an extended term based on proof of the biased purpose by a preponderance of the evidence rather than proof found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't think hate crime laws could have prevented the Holocaust because I can't imagine Hitler calling off his plans after seeing he was doing something that is against the law in another country. A second-degree assault is ordinarliy classified as a D violent felony, which can bring up to seven years in prison for someone without a previous felony conviction. Now, if someone is convicted of a hate crime, that D floney becomes a C felony, which brings a sentence of between three and a half and fifteen years. "This whole 'hate crimes' push is just the initial baby steps in a leftist attempt to codify political correctness. (A-164-1997) Argued October 13, 1998 -- Decided June 24, 1999 Apprendi was arrested in December 1994 for shooting the home of a black family. Apprendi stated to police that he was giving the family a message that because they were black in color, they were not wanted in the neighborhood. On appeal, Apprendi argued that he had been sentenced under an unconstitutionally vague law, noting it permitted an extended term if the crime had been committed "at least in part with ill will, hatred or bias toward the victim. And under existing state law, there are also mandatory minimum penalties, which increases as the categories are bumped up under the hate crimes law. The State reserved the right to make application under the hate crimes law for imposition of an extended sentence.
Common topics in this essay:
Decided June,
Amendment Constitution,
,
hate crimes,
Argued October,
hate crime,
hate crime laws,
crime laws,
extended term,
laws prevented holocaust,
crime laws prevented,
hate crimes law,
imposition extended,
murdering saying,
laws prevented,
crimes hate,
crimes law,
prevented holocaust,
|
Acceptance Essays
