The Constitution a Brief Synopsis of its Relevance
The Constitution: A Brief Synopsis of its Relevance Article Five, clause two to the United State Constitution states, "under the Authority of the United States, the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land." More than two hundred years after its ratification, the Constitution is still the operating charter of the United States. Many such documents throughout history have either failed or have outgrown its developing societies. But there is one unique aspect of the United States Constitution that separates it from all other such documents, it is neither self-explanatory nor a comprehensive description of our constitutional rules (Burns 42). It is because of the Constitutions vagueness that our government is able to interpret it to fit our developing society. Many believe the Constitution has become irrelevant because no guiding principles seem to exist. Thomas Jefferson once said, "The Constitution belongs to the living and not the dead" (Malone 130). Accordingly, it is often referred to as a "living" document because of its regular alteration and reexamination; therefore, the Constitution has not become irrelevant in defining the goals of the American Government. This will be shown by examining how the Constitution ens
The Constitution also prohibits religious qualifications for seeking and holding a governmental office, and it secures the right of a trial by jury of peers in a criminal case (Adams 236). The highest court, the Supreme Court, is located in Washington D. He is required to give a "state of the union" address each year in order to inform Congress of the present condition of the United States as a whole (Irving 181). Article Three deals with the third branch of the government-the judicial branch. It is because of this habit that the Supreme Court is often the eventual resting place for a societal issue (Chase 47). The Founders knew the Constitution would need to develop and change with society, which explains its vagueness and why each individual would interpret it differently. Despite the fact that the original text is over two hundred years old, the document through the interpretation of the Supreme Court, is still able to consistently shape public policy at will. Most people favor they're constitutionally given rights in theory, but their support diminishes when the time to put the rights into practice arrives. Certain military powers involve declaring war, raising and supporting armies, regulating and maintaining navies, and supplying militias (Burns 27). On the other hand, Senators must have attained the age of thirty years, be a citizen for at least nine years, and also reside in the state for which he is elected. The Constitution is extremely ambiguous concerning individual rights and personal freedoms of man.
Common topics in this essay:
Supreme Court,
House Representatives,
Bill Rights,
United Constitution,
British Wolff,
United Irving,
Founders Constitution,
Convention Dallas,
Jefferson Constitution,
American Government,
supreme court,
bill rights,
united constitution,
constitution irrelevant,
freedom speech,
irving 180,
individual rights,
federal government,
burns 27,
public policy,
supreme court able,
upholds american ideas,
writ habeas corpus,
american ideas rights,
goals american government,
|
Acceptance Essays
