The Great Roman Empire (Rome vs Han)
Without a doubt, the Roman and the Han empires can be considered two of the greatest ever. Both became very powerful and dominant in their respective areas. However, the Roman Empire developed into a higher, more advanced society because of their strong economic system, military prowess and their free social structure.While both the Romans and the Hans developed complex economic systems, the system the Romans used was clearly superior. Though both the Romans and the Hans were obviously dependent of agriculture, the vast spread of the Roman Empire into different regions allowed for the trade of different goods such as European wine and African grains. Each individual area specialized in certain products, and these products could be taken by way of the Mediterranean to anywhere else in the empire. While they also had some variety of goods, the Hans, with their smaller empire, were limited to growing wheat and rice. Water transportation was crucial to the economy of the Roman region, as it allowed fast and efficient movement of goods. Another aspect of Roman economy was the use of slave labor, which is something that the Hans did not utilize. The Romans used their prisoners as slaves. The use of slaves, while not considered humane
Both the Romans and the Hans had a grand, powerful army. In conclusion, the success of the ancient Roman Empire as developing into a higher, more advanced society than the Han Empire is attributed to their economic strength, military expertise and social order. The belief of ancestors being part of the families added to the rigid hierarchy of family life and prevented individualism, which would have required freedom to act the way one wished. The men were considered superior to the women, who had limited rights almost everywhere in the world. Both the Romans and the Hans demanded taxes from their citizens, but the Hans took large amounts of taxes even from the poor peasants. This increased work force produced larger yields and more goods to trade. Overall, the Romans had a superior economic system when compared to the Hans. The Roman society was also quite individualistic when compared to the Han society. However, the Hans gave the females almost no rights. Both the Romans and the Hans believed that the father was the head of the household. Both societies also employed the Silk Road as a means of trade with far away lands, but the Hans, with their silk products, dominated this trade route. He was the one who controlled the money and family members, and could even sell the labor of his children. In contrast, Roman women had some rights such as being able to freely travel and being able to own and run businesses. To sum up, the Roman social system was much more successful than the one found in Han China. Thus, while the Han people had little social mobility, the Roman did have mobility if they did well in their jobs.
Common topics in this essay:
Romans Hans,
Roman Empire,
Overall Romans,
Silk Road,
Han Empire,
Roman Han,
romans hans,
Han China,
roman army,
roman empire,
conquered people soldiers,
,
roman army conquered,
army conquered people,
romans superior,
people live,
social system,
conquered people,
people soldiers,
army conquered,
romans hans believed,
han empire,
|
Acceptance Essays
