Philosophy of God
Who I am and how God fits into that picture is a very intricate question. Mankind has always pondered about her own existence and in thousands of different cultures the idea of some supreme power always seems to develop. Now, this is by no means proof of the actual existence of God, but it does give the question a good deal of importance. I am a human being, which means many things, for one that I have a corporal existence and also that I think and am self-aware which adds a mental, or non-physical aspect. As James Marsh says, "If my account of the self is critically comprehensive, . . . then it will include the sensuous and the intellectual, the cognitive and existential, in a dynamic, intelligible unity" (Marsh 113). Then I must considering the corporal limitations and spiritual freedom of man "in such a way that I accept facts and limits without giving in to defeatism and despair, and embrace ideals and hopes without giving into false utopianism and a repressive idealism" (Marsh 116). The tendency for people to concentrate solely on one aspect of the human person has been a mistake that many great minds have made, e.g. Bertrand Russell or even Sartre, thus limiting themselves to one aspect of humanity and giving an inad
So, what does this all mean for me? To be honest I am not really sure. The components of this multi-faceted person can be broken down into several different categories. Barret would argue that there must be a place for the irrational along with the rational to counterbalance each other making a theory greater than the respective theories of either of the disjointed pair. Fourth, she is existential in that she, through despair, "nausea," and absurdity she might come to a greater understanding of herself and God. Third, she is a rational being with the ability of introspection, making judgments and "having an interpretive world of language and of shared meanings" (Johnson 4). I am a young, middle class, white male living in the United States and I am Catholic. equate explanation of the human person and the things around us. One of the components of the human person had to do with having interpretive language and shared meanings, and since a human person cannot ask any question without relying on some sort of language which is essentially ambiguous and open divergent perceptions, "the answers to these questions are always going to be ambiguous and subject to misinterpretation" (Johnson 5). they think of how God's existence is not necessarily a priori true, and hold that it is a posteriori false also, they however are still limiting themselves to only one aspect of reality, and however convincing their rationale might sound the theory can only be incomplete in the same way Descartes' theory was. Further application of each of the parts of a human person is what these characteristics mean in respect to a greater power, namely God. Finally, she is free to choose as she might, as a morally responsible agent, the life she wishes and also to ask questions like "who am I?" or "How speak of God?" All these components, although very different in nature and in some cases opposite, coexist in the essence of what humanity is. " I have to say that I have thought about this issue many times and I still believe in God. For the most part, virtually all atheists (who carry the burden of disproving God's existence) justify themselves by rational means (with the exception of Nietzsche who through an existential journey concluded Christ to have died on the cross), e. The alternative (what I am suggesting) is a combination of seemingly mutually exclusive theories, but the human personage is multi-faceted, and "the genuine heroism for man is still the power to support contradictions, no matter how glaring or hopeless they seem" (Becker 198).
Common topics in this essay:
St Augustine,
Russell Sartre,
James Marsh,
,
United Catholic,
God Finally,
God Descartes,
Ignacio Ellacuria,
human person,
existence god,
language shared meanings,
limiting themselves aspect,
shared meanings,
rational means,
themselves aspect,
limiting themselves,
explain phenomena,
self-serving delusion,
laws science,
language shared,
|
Acceptance Essays
