DNA Profiling Negative and Positive
The Positive And Negative Effects of DNA Profiling Genetic engineering has developed and blossomed at a frightening rate inthe last decade. Originating as merely an area of interest for scientists,genetic engineering has now become an area of which all people should besomewhat knowledgeable. DNA profiling has many uses, both positive and negative, in our society.Aside from its usefulness in many legal investigations, DNA profiling can beused in the workplace to discriminate against employees whose profiles couldpose a financial risk. For example, genetic technology can and has been used todetermine the capacity of a person to contract certain diseases, such as sickle-cell anemia, which could cause many employers to hesitate in the hiring andtraining of such people. In the early 1970's, the United States began a carrierscreening for sickle-cell anemia, which affects 1 in 400 African-Americans. Many of those identified as carriers mistakenly thought they were afflicted withthis debilitating disease. Furthermore, confidentiality was often breached, andin some cases, carriers were discriminated against and denied health insurance.Nevertheless, genetic profiling has been beneficial in paternity suits and rapecases, where the father
This negates the insurers policy of setting premiums with accordanceto statistical information on the rates of illnesses and sicknesses in society. Ellen spent four years completing her PhD in industrial and chemical engineering. "By agreeing to payfor some infants and not for others, insurance companies could inadvertentlypractice a form of economic eugenics, based not on grand designs for a superracebut on who requires the least expensive medical care. "Genetictesting may provide the best reason yet for a nationalized health-care policy. The job has been offered to someone else. Besides, one could make a plausible argument that, once held in custody, theseizure of a person's strand of hair does not violate a suspect's FourthAmendment rights or rights of privacy because the hair is visible. The ruling inthe Daubert case said that the acceptance by the scientific community is notenough by itself to allow certain scientific techniques into court as evidence,especially given the reality that a suspects entire future could hang in thebalance of a scientific finding. Of 55 responses, Billings and Beckwith could document29 people who reported multiple instances of discrimination by adoption agencies,employers and insurers. "Limits to DNA Fingerprinting," Research News. You are perfectly healthy, the youngdoctor said.
Common topics in this essay:
Information Bureau,
Profiling Genetic,
Billings Beckwith,
Thomas Hobbes,
Amendment Besides,
Sophisticated DNA,
Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Patient Care,
Fourth Amendmentprotection,
Trial Aug,
dna profiling,
insurance companies,
browniee 57,
aug 1994,
genetic testing,
genetic screening,
health insurance,
trial aug,
trial aug 1994,
employers jama,
genetic screening employers,
wider implications,
jama 2 oct,
oct 1991 1827,
2 oct 1991,
|
Acceptance Essays
