Big Fish Comparasion - Movie to Book
It is hard to fully describe the storyline and plot of Big Fish by Daniel Wallace in just one sentence, paragraph, or essay. It is the tale of Edward Bloom as told through the retelling of his many stories by his son William. It is through these stories that William even knew his father. But this is quite possibly the most intricate description that can be given without unfairly including a personal interpretation of the words in the book. What is true upon looking deep into the story is that there is very little plot defined in the actual reading and much of the story is developed in the reader's imagination. The cinematic version of Big Fish, directed by Tim Burton and screenplay by John August, is simply the creator's interpretation of the writer's words. The words were expanded upon and millions of dollars were spent to make the understanding that the film creators had of the reading become available for anyone with eyes and ears. It is astounding how different the story could become when it is brought to life by the visual effects of modern day dramatic cinema and a more imaginative story telling and story interpreting ingenuity. When comparing the novel version of Big Fish to its motion picture counterpart, much ca
This makes Edward's Bloom's character more believable as well. It proves the point that reading adds the irreplaceable element of imagination to any story. " This leaves the imagination to create what ever it wishes in order to make coherence out of these chapters in regard to when specifically it happened in time. Some stories are told before others that happened sooner in chronological time. Perhaps they are being retold in the order that they were told to William, but they are clearly not told in the order of which they occurred. William is characterized very minimally in the reading outside of being a son who wishes to see past his father's fictional stories into the non-fictional man behind them and this is left much the same in the film. Edward Bloom is on his deathbed and all of the stories are rehashed in his son's last trip to visit his dying father. The movie outlines these chapters and develops them into the present tense of the story. It is ironic that the entire novel in itself is a story about storytelling. The movie is forced to have some form of stable time frame due to the fact that when experiencing something visually, the mind will not create its own guidelines. Characterization is also noticeably different from the novel to the big screen. Sometimes, vague implications are mistaken for facts when reading, but this is impossible when dealing with a film scenario. In the novel, there was absolutely no mention of William's wife but she is used as an important medium for many of Edward Bloom's stories to be told in the movie. Most of the plot in the movie follows the general idea of the novel but it is significantly different in the regard that many of the less interesting of Edward Bloom's stories in the book were either changed or discarded altogether. Also, parts may have been left out due to time restraints or relevancy to the movie plot.
Common topics in this essay:
Edward Bloom,
Edward's Bloom's,
John August,
Edward Bloom's,
Daniel Wallace,
edward bloom,
,
creator's interpretation,
Tim Burton,
stories told,
interpretation writer's words,
death edward bloom,
writer's words,
bloom's stories,
trip visit,
edward bloom's,
edward bloom's stories,
motion picture,
death edward,
film creators,
|
Acceptance Essays
