Public Smoking Banned
Cigarette smoke contains over 4,000 chemicals. Of those chemicals, 40 of them have been proven to cause cancer (SWAT). It's no wonder why a bill is being passed to ban smoking in all public places. However, this will have the greatest effect on restaurants across the nation. The next great smoking debate will decide whether you can "puff" in restaurants. In a democracy, like the one we live in, the majority rules, while trying to respect the rights of the minority. In this case, the minority being smokers, seem to have more rights than the majority. But the majority has taken it into their own hands and passed a bill to ban smoking in all public places. The ban would only apply to the common areas of the restaurants, especially if the dining areas were enclosed and had a separate entrance. Smoking, however, might be prohibited in a lobby if a nearby restaurant wasn't enclosed (Czurak). Of course, there will always be holes or vagueness in passing bills and making rules. It is uncertain whether the bill would allow smoking on open-air decks and patios, and it's not clear whether anyone could light up on an outdoor deck that was screened in the summer and heated in the winter (Czurak). Th
Of course, those who smoke are also against this bill. In Massachusetts, studies have proven that the smoke free ordinances have not effected any restaurant revenue (Martin). They believe that the owners of that property and the operators of those establishments should make the decision as to whether or not they will allow patrons to smoke or not. Restaurants that have already enforced the ban have quite a bit to say about the issue. Why? Because they go there for the food, the social hours, the location, or simply the convenience of not cooking a meal themselves. Thus, increasing the business for that particular restaurant. It would be extremely difficult for many restaurants to convert to clubs if they had liquor licenses. is is because the bill says no smoking in all public areas. California's statute is nearly two years old, and the California Lung Association flaunts the state's regulations as proof that restaurants and even bars won't face economic decline when smoking is banned (Hoogeveen). Smoking has been proven to cause many diseases and this ban could only help to reduce that statistic. In addition to those in favor of the ban, there are also those who are completely against it. That was when restaurants were considering whether or not they should be required to have separate areas for nonsmokers (Sheraton). Recent tobacco suits were just settled in that states received large chunks of money and the companies get guaranteed immunity from state lawsuits (Tubbesing). The ones that have decided to keep a separate smoking area have had to install superior air conditioning so that the place has proper filtration from the cigarette smoke. But now the government wants to ban the use of a legal product on what is private property that is open to the public.
Common topics in this essay:
Cancer Society,
SWAT It's,
Hoogeveen Smokers,
Germany Spain,
SWAT Ultimately,
Bryan Fenske,
Lung Association,
Banned Cigarette,
Jack Watters,
Romaniuk Bans,
ban smoking,
cigarette smoke,
smoking public,
ban smoking public,
smoking ban,
lung association,
association american,
ban benefit,
air conditioning,
proven cause,
people business,
|
Acceptance Essays
