The Art of Teching
1. In the paper below, five differing paradigms of leadership are noted. Do you agree that considering leadership from differing paradigmatic perspectives is important as we enter the twenty-first century? Discuss your response. What do you believe to be the essential attributes for leadership in the 21st century?The twenty-first century. What does this era represent for humankind? In order to discuss these issues, one must first identify the implications of this epoch. It is a time of speedy change, war, poverty, starvation, and advances in social science. Consequently, it is a time of immense changes and supercharged issues, we are well advised to adopt multiple views of leadership to anticipate, manage and implement those required changes. A willingness to listen, charisma, transformation, empowerment, are some of the keys to effective leaders. Examination of leadership from various paradigmatic perspectives is useful in attacking a multilayered issue such as leadership in the twenty-first century. In this discussion posting I will explore the various attributes of leadership that I feel are important for today's leaders and I will address the five paradigmatic perspectives provided in Fennel (2001).
And I saw that it was holy (Neihardt, 1961, p. I believe order exists to be upset and turned on "its ear" in order to infuse an organization with life and instigate change. I would like to work in this type of environment in my own organization because it would stimulate teacher leadership and administrative leadership. In this paradigm I see a melding of a variety of others which include the following, situational, transformative, and constructivist paradigms. This paradigm appears to combine the best elements of its predecessors and would be desirable in an organization providing all these elements are implemented. Consequently, there exists a paradox of power that moves freely within the organization and power that is fixed and unable to move freely. Once, this is achieved another circle is created and layered within the first circle, until a completed globe is formed. Examining the critical paradigm, one notes that it strives for emancipatory leadership within the community and includes four criteria: educative, ethical, transformative, and critical qualities within its members. Similar to a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) double spiral helix winding its way skywards. It also limits independent reasoning, internal discipline, and growth in the employee. In today's leadership paradigm the semblance of harmony is desired which could overlook the superb solution generated through conflict and diversity (Patterson, 1993, p. In my relational paper, I also refer to a circle-spiral paradigm of inquiry. In this conception, power and leadership qualities are not limited to one leader but are shared among a community of leaders.
Common topics in this essay:
According Covey,
Gail LaFleur,
Robbins Stuart-Kotze,
,
Bentz Shapiro,
According Weedon,
fennel 2001,
constructivist paradigm,
leadership paradigm,
Inquiry Buddhist,
paradigmatic perspectives,
twenty-first century,
transformational leader,
patterson 1993,
patterson 1993 57,
attributes leadership,
type environment,
cited fennel,
cited fennel 2001,
|
Acceptance Essays
