Gun Control and its Controversies
Gun Control and it's Controversies The arguments on gun control have been a very controversial and ongoing debate betweenmany well respected individuals. Doctors, Lawyers, Media, Criminologists, and many others have all been debating on whether or not the government should pass stricter laws on gun control. Government, individuals, among others have supported independent studies to prove their point on the issues of gun control. Numerous laws have been passed in regard to these studies on gun control over the years. In the essay, "Just Take Away Their Guns", James Q .Wilson stated that guns should be taken away from the criminals and not the law abiding citizens. In Wilson's essay, he includes a household survey by Gary Kleck, which estimates that there are more people who defend themselves with a gun than people arrested to violent crimes and burglaries. Wilson then supports the Second Amendment which allows people the right to bear arms. Therefore, he thinks taking guns away from individuals would not be the most effective way to reduce illegal guns from being used. He states all individuals with handguns should have a permit and the law officers should take away all others. Wilson then states
Pat-down or frisking a person is legitimate if there is a "reasonable suspicion", even though "reasonable suspicion" has to be supported by specific facts. Owning a handgun as an individual can take more lives than it can save. People commit the crimes and due to anger the gun can make it deadly. Anyone who owns a gun has the potential to kill. The studies done by the doctors were only achieved by what the doctors saw in the hospital setting. While on the other hand, she stated that there were individuals doing well designed research that did not agree with the government's findings. The study also showed that allowing people to have a concealed gun creates a greater effect in high population counties and in high crime counties. These studies showed that guns were definitely needed for self-defense and not a dangerous as previous studies had shown. The studies included in her essay, gave both sides of the gun control argument. In "Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed" by Nan Desuka, she states that guns should be completely banned for average citizen use by the government because anyone in possession of a gun has the potential to kill. This was one sided because they never saw the other side where peoples lives were saved through the use of guns. Therefore, she believes that the police and individuals should work together for everyone's safety. The government paid well respected doctors, scientist and professionals to do research proving that guns were bad. Forbidding or severely restricting the sale of guns ignores the facts that although gun ownership has been increasing while the fatal gun accidents have been declining. One of the common knowledge facts is that gun ownership in your home will increase your risk of homicide by a factor of 43.
Common topics in this essay:
Gun Control,
Guns Gun,
Nan Desuka,
Outlawed People,
Sarah Thompson,
Gary Kleck,
Media Criminologists,
James Wilson,
gun control,
Violent Crimes,
guns criminals,
taking guns,
law abiding citizens,
violent crimes,
criminals hands,
reasonable suspicion,
prevents violent,
handguns outlawed,
gun detector,
bear arms,
Handguns Outlawed,
concealed carry prevents,
available fewer criminals,
carry prevents violent,
themselves kill ward,
|
Acceptance Essays
