A Small Price to Pay
Similar to my experience with stricter airport security rules, the United States Senate has approved of the creation of a massive Department of Homeland Security that will transform the way the federal government responds to emerging terrorist threats. Many Americans have argued against the creation of this department saying that it will take away too many freedoms. I ask these people, “What good are these freedoms if terrorists wipe you out before you can enjoy them?” Although many fear that the new laws created since 9/11 will transform our nation into a police state, the new laws exchange a minimal amount of freedom for vital security against terrorism. Let us begin with what the Homeland Security Act is and how it can benefit Americans. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11th have changed United States operations, attitudes, and priorities, the government has created the Homeland Security Act. The four main divisions of this act are the Border and Transportation Security, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures, and Information Analysis and Infrastructure protests. Each division works to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduces Ameri . . .
Terrorists, like Muhammad Atta, were able to board a commercial airliner with box cutters hidden in their luggage that were used to kill flight attendants, enter cockpits and ultimately cause the attacks of September 11th. The point is that although citizens will have their freedoms taken away, the government is giving them protection while they exercise their remaining freedom. ca's vulnerability to terrorism, and minimizes the damage and recovers from attacks that do occur. Once a legitimate threat has been determined, it is up to the government to detain suspects. For example, the government, along with intelligence agencies, may need to check citizens' unopened e-mail or tap phone conversations. The current situation of the United States is like fishing. As a result, however, Americans will be better shielded from a potentially fatal illness that has already claimed lives. But why, some argue, because of the actions of a criminal few should law-abiding citizens be deprived of their comfort regarding their rights to privacy and due process? Simply put, the sacrifice of freedom will lead to the government’s prevention of terrorism. The very fact that the government is trying its very best to heighten security is a comfort to Americans everywhere. In addition, because of concern regarding threats of anthrax and bio-terrorism, the United States mail, a federal service, must now open citizens' mail as a means of detecting anthrax. One buys the expensive lures, so he is more likely to catch more fish. ” However, each division of the act will limit freedoms and privacy that Americans enjoy. Two men go fishing, and each must choose between expensive lures, or cheap, ineffective lures. However, if the American people allow the government to heighten security, there is a good chance that terrorist attacks will be prevented and thus, they will be allowed to enjoy their freedom, just as the fisherman who bought expensive bait enjoys his fish.
Common topics in this essay:
Transportation Security, Homeland Security, Muhammad Atta, Tom Ridge, Security Act, Analysis Infrastructure, , homeland security, United Senate, terrorist attacks, stricter airport, Department Homeland, Border Transportation, stricter airport security, attacks september 11th, expensive lures, security act, department homeland, transportation security, department homeland security, box cutters, border transportation security, heighten security, homeland security act, border transportation, |