Controversy in Research
Research is ubiquitous; it lies deep inside the heart of every issue encountered by society as a whole. It enables the populace to delve into the core of a matter, and discover its inner-workings. However, accompanying this inner discovery is the notion of controversy, which can make or break research. It plays a key role in the funding or lack there of. If a great number of people's views differ from that of the majority, it makes it very difficult to acquire funding to further research and vice versa. In one case, that of the Kennewick man, much controversy looms over the exploration of the bones found on the shores of the Columbia River. Like the situation involving the Kennewick man, Pennsylvania State University is experiencing similar difficulties with it's research of propulsor and turbomachinery design, items involved in war. Both situations involve many ramifications that make it complicated for quality research to be done. Although both have many obstacles to overcome, they persevere, and share the knowledge that they have obtained. In the extreme northwestern United States, in Washington State, a boat race took place. Two fans, William Thomas, and Dave Deacy pulled their own boat ashore and waded in the
Joe Ballard, commander of the Army Corps of Engineers, expressing alarm that the corps planned to give up the skeleton before it could be studied. "I was stunned when I examined the pelvic bone and the projectile point associated with it," wrote MacMillan in an August 31 letter to the Benton County coroner, "so I decided to reexamine the skull. She had made many of the same observations as Chatter. It is situations like these that make it very difficult for people to receive funding for their projects, and to prosper in their field. (Preston)12 If this was to happen, no one would ever know the true identity of the Kennewick Man. The Umatilla have announced their intention to rebury the skeleton as soon as it is repatriated . They noted that results of the various studies carried out on the bones raise some doubt as to whether the skeleton is related to modern Indian tribes. " (Preston)14 Many scientists offer complaints that allege that the Corps of Engineers determined the remains were culturally affiliated to the five tribes without sufficient evidence. This is an exciting new endeavor for the Pennsylvania State University, but might not be looked as so to those who are pacifists, opposed to war. Furthermore, they contended, "A reliable determination of whether the skeleton is Native American within the meaning of NAGPRA cannot be made without.
Common topics in this essay:
Pennsylvania University,
Corps Engineers,
Native American,
Benton County,
,
Chatters Chatters,
Roger2 Chatters,
Perce August,
Thomas11 Umatilla,
According NAGPRA,
native american,
corps engineers,
pennsylvania university,
native american graves,
graves protection,
protection repatriation,
graves protection repatriation,
american graves protection,
columbia river,
american graves,
related modern,
protection repatriation act,
skeleton's age,
skeleton native american,
engineers determined,
|
Acceptance Essays
