Hamlet as a Trajic Hero

After reading some of Shakespeare’s plays I have drawn a couple conclusions. In addition, hamlet seemingly disregards the death of his presumed love, Ophelia. This gives a magnitude of difference to the interpretation of the tragic hero’s flaws, emotions, and personality. This is probably the best way for an audience to relate to a character because rejection is something felt by everyone, and this sometimes makes it easier to take knowing a “Hero” has also been rejected. Some have chosen to see no good in Hamlet. To start of with, performed they are much easier to understand. ng the catalyst to his, and his wife’s life. All these deaths could have possibly been easily avoided had Hamlet choose not to act on the ghost of his father, but then the audience would be left without much of a tragic hero, or storyline. All these examples can draw conclusions that though Aristotle can be proved to be right, the finial decision whether or not these are all characteristics of a tragic hero, the final decision is up to you, the reader. Hamlet’s journey consisted of all these things and with considerable detail teaching us and Hamlet of the real cause of Hamlet’s father’s death. These readers are gathering Shakespeare’s information in the play of Hamlet that he was only a murderer and an antagonist rather than a protagonist. Not only do you hear the tragic hero, but you can visually see his actions as well. Examples are as follows; Polonius, and old childhood friends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Hamlet falls in love, and is rejected by the object of this affection.