What's the real problem (Supremacy Crimes)
Supremacy by definition is supreme power or authority. In Steinem's essay she discusses men's 'authority' over women, or the lack there of. She also discusses what she feels contributed to this desire that men have. She discusses her views and supports her statements with actual accounts of this need for supremacy through murders. Steinem's argument is that we teach our sons growing up to overpower women, causing them to have a desire and need to feel accepted by over powering others. She feels that the reason for these supremacy crimes is in how we raise our children. That, in this country, we raise our sons and daughters differently. Our sons learn at a young age that they should have power over women, Steinem says. She also states in her essay that 'our' in the media is read as white, middle-class, and heterosexual. "It's our sons - and 'our' can usually be read as 'white,' 'middle-class,' and 'heterosexual'" (Steinem 353). The use of language in an essay like this is extremely important. One aspect that helps her argument is her repetitiveness. Steinem makes her point once in plain words, then she can make her point several other ways in different context. This
a homophobic one that empowers only one form of sexuality" (354). Steinem mentions people such as Colin Ferguson, Waneta Hoyt, and Aileen Carol Wuornos that don't fit her criteria to help her build credibility. "Men of color and females are capable of serial and mass killing, and commit just enough to prove it" (Steinem 354). way, the reader will remember the point she is trying to make and he or she will remember it as he or she continues reading the essay. This is to get the audience to trust her a little more. This does help her argument because it gives the impression that she has looked at the topic of discussion from all aspects and considered them all. But first, we need to admit that the problem is. This is a good way of making the reader understand what her point is. Edmund Kemper who started killing animals, then proceeded to his grandparents. David Berkowitz was another example she gave. Then he tortured and killed college girls. Steinem goes on to say "The reasons are buried deep in the culture, so invisible that only by reversing our assumptions can we reveal them" (355). So is the question of who is to blame still unanswered? Is someone to blame besides the killers themselves? .
Common topics in this essay:
Accelerated Rhetoric,
Carol Wuornos,
Wayne Williams,
Edmund Kemper,
David Berkowitz,
Ted Bundy,
supreme power authority,
354 steinem,
raise children,
raise sons daughters,
change raise,
tortured killed,
power authority,
sons daughters,
steinem 354,
fit criteria,
raise sons,
supreme power,
|
Acceptance Essays
