In 1859, Charles Darwin published his book the Origin of Species, which would forever change the way people thought about the creation of man. In his book, Darwin made two main points. First, he claimed that man evolved into his current physical state over a time period of millions of years. Secondly, he discussed a method for how this “evolution” worked. For this he gave the term “natural selection.” Darwin asserted that natural selection was a process through which organisms adapted over time to the climate in which they were situated. The individuals with the stronger traits thus had more surviving offspring. Through this filter of evolution, the strongest individuals survived. So, Darwin’s evolution worked in that each generation of beings became progressively stronger, and so this continuous process is the source of the evolution of species.
As we all know though, the idea of creationism had been written in the Bible long before Darwin had ever been born. Thus creationism was the known and accepted method for the creation of man for several hundreds of years.
Shortly after Darwin’s Origin of Species was published, it seemed as if creationism and evolution could peacefully coexist as alternate theories regarding the
. . .
Creationists did not give up; they simply changed approaches. However, the most persuasive evidence of the religion-based motives underlying the Kansas Action concerns Board member Steve Abrams, the third coauthor of the Alternative Plan. Johnson “firmly believed in the biblical account of creation” and sought to prevent the Board from approving science standards that emphasize macroevolution. This, however, does not salvage the constitutionality of the Kansas Action. As one prominent fundamentalist stated, “When we can get an active Christian parents’ committee in operation in all districts, we can take complete control of all the local school boards.
Creationists have employed these approaches in the evolution/creationism debate. Bryan claimed to be an expert on the truth of the Bible, and took the stand. One topic that Bryan struggled to explain was the days of Genesis and how long they might have lasted. The ACLU believed that the Tennessee legislature gave preference to the Christian religion.
At the same time George Rappelyea, a scientifically oriented engineer along with a group of Dayton businessmen, saw this controversy as an opportunity to bring in crowds from afar to the small town of Dayton, in order to hopefully jump-start the town’s lagging economy.
The next aim of the defense was to bring William Jennings Bryan to the stand as a witness. Between 1963-64, the BSCS published three science textbooks…that were thoroughly permeated by evolutionary theory. Analysis of the rationales for this discretion leads to a conclusion that the Kansas Action is not protected from the judiciary's interference.
Approximate Word count =
4086
Approximate Pages =
16 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|