Subjects:
Such incidents like that have been happening all the time. Isn’t it a right of ours to have privacy? Wasn’t there an amendment to make sure no anonymous searches and seizures take place? When it comes down to such questions, both sides have a different view.
Students feel that their privacy is being violated. So far the Supreme Court has not issued that it is unconstitutional or not if a random drug testing for any student occurs. Still, random people
. . .
The Supreme Court gave way that it is constitutional to hold such drug tests for extra-curricular activities and such. The government believes that kicking students out of school for such acts will only make matters worse by. A federal judge in Oklahoma took sides with the school, but the U. Acton, in 1995 in which the Supreme Court ruled that it was OK to randomly test athletes only if there was reason to suspect such a wrong-doing. The fact about random drug tests on regular students still stands as an issue. We are allowed to be completely violated at times, and it’s alright when it comes down to the Supreme Court. When Lindsey Earls was asked to be tested in 1998 in order to join a competitive singing group, she refused and clamed that such of an action violated her privacy. Several students have spoke out saying that they feel that this is taking away their rights as a citizen. They have conducted experiments and it shows that such drugs as Marijuana and Ecstasy can give harmful long term affects on the brain. Now that people in extra-curricular activities are able to be randomly drug tested, we are losing those rights as students. The case then entered the Supreme Court in 2002 as the Board of Education of Independent School District No. The government has proven that long-term effects spring from drug use. The drug testing idea plans to aid those who do fail the test to try and live a healthier life without drugs.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.