Euthanasia

Euthanasia should be permissible only in certain cases. It is a controversial issue that society is facing. It is the practice of painlessly ending the lives of people who have incurable diseases. Some severely handicapped patients have ended their lives this way. The issue is whether physicians who practice euthanasia should be prosecuted. Some people euthanasia is a kind of mercy killing. Yet, others insist it is the same as murder. In my opinion, only in extreme cases, physicians should be allowed to end their patients’ lives. These patients are ones considered to be permanently unconscious or in comas. They have no chance to recover. Everyone involved suffer. The hospital fee is quite costly.

First of all, patient has no hope for recovery. He is being kept alive by breathing devices, artificial feeding, and medical procedures. He looks alive, but he is already dead. He can’t digest his food. He can’t breathe on his own. His heart can’t even beat on its own. He exists with no hope for recovery. Joseph P. Shariro, author of A vote on legal euthanasia, states: “It’s the nightmare of American medicine: to be kept alive in a hospit

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

Unquestionably, they feel much more hurt watching their loved one being kept alive by machines and tubes. As only God can start a life, only God possesses the right to end one. McGough, a family practitioner insists: “People have very real fears about end-of-life care. In other words, the patient’s family faces a terrible financial burden.

In conclusion, thousands of people are in comas or permanently unconscious. ” Such pain does not end here, the burden continues. So, what does this leave us?

I strongly believe that if there exists any means of life-support systems that can help a patient to recover health, it’s not morally appropriate to end the patient’s life. The relatives spend a lot of time caring for their patient. This leads us to our next rationale. On the other hand, when costly technology can’t contribute to an improvement in the patient’s condition, it may be morally responsible to withhold. The physicians and their families should have the right to remove life-support equipment. They have the right to remove life support equipment.

Approximate Word count = 793
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD	ONLINE CHECK



JOIN BY PHONE

Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.

Join Now

Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

permanently unconscious