Dna Testing
"That's not my kid." This can be heard on many talk shows on television. Many people go on talk shows to have DNA tests done to find the father's of the babies so they can find the real fathers and start getting some financial support from them.DNA testing is a highly sophisticated laboratory process that was considered state of the art a few years ago. Today DNA testing is a very common practice that is used widely by many people. The United State Department of Justices has done a study on the use of DNA testing and they have found many issues involving the testing. DNA testing involves the use of blood, tissues, or any body fluids to find the DNA fingerprint of a person. DNA fingerprinting can be used to identify people. Although there can be many advantages with the use of DNA testing, there are too many controversies involved with the testing and it should not be used.I think that DNA testing is too controversial to be used in determining whether or not a person goes to jail or not. There are too many things that can go wrong with the testing to be using it to determine a person's future. The only thing that should be used in determining a person's future is something that is not filled with so man
Although the ending up taking the blood of the suspect, the supreme court found that it was unlawful and violated the American notions of privacy and liberty. It is very unfair to the defense because the testing is so expensive and the defense might not be able to afford the testing to prove the results were correct and the test was done correctly. The fourth amendment is that people are free from illegal search and seizures. Many courts like the New York State Court of Appeals need more than probable cause for a permit to take blood from a suspect. A group of Yale University geneticists and the Office of Technology Assessment both have said that DNA testing is a very accurate means of identification even among members of the same ethnic group. If they tested the entire strand then there would be no chance of a mistake in identifying a person. DNA testing can also be used to help free people from jail because they can use the DNA to show that the person was not at a crime scene. There are many advantages of using DNA testing. Some critics claim that it is not reliable enough to use in court. They also find that it overwhelms the defense and it blinds the jury to other evidence. If their DNA sample was found at a crime scene they couldn't say that it's not their DNA because there is only a 100 million to one chance that someone else has the same DNA pattern as you. Law enforcement officials are required to obtain a search warrant if they want to get body fluids or tissues from a suspect. In the court case of the People vs. William Sessions has said that of all the new techniques emerging for the criminal investigator, is the DNA identification technology.
Common topics in this essay:
Department Justices,
Justice Warren,
BJS/SEARCH DNA,
Court Appeals,
Forensic DNA,
dna testing,
Testing That's,
William Sessions,
Criminal Justice,
California's Attorney,
Assessment DNA,
body fluids,
crime scene,
dna pattern,
evidence trials,
found crime,
body fluids tissues,
identify people,
found crime scene,
fluids tissues,
dna testing help,
person dna,
testing evidence trials,
forensic dna,
testing dna testing,
|
Acceptance Essays
