Government and School
School choice will improve education in America. Public schools are grossly inefficient, and are not educating many of America's youths adequately. Schools that are run independent from local government bureaucracy provide better education at lower cost. School choice would allow more students to attend better schools. School choice is a potent educational reform that is far more effective than increased spending. The fears of opponents of school choice are factually unfounded. School choice is necessary to improve American education. Through allowing more parental choice in education, school choice forces education into a free market environment. As it is now, parents send children to the nearest school, assigned to them by the school district. If a family is wealthy enough and chooses to do so, parents can send children to private schools. However, this family then pays twice for one education. They still pay their taxes, and they pay the tuition for the private school. Under a school choice plan, any parent who decides to send their child to a private school will receive a scholarship from the government, redeemable for tuition at scholarship accepting private schools. The scholarship dollar amount is far below that of the
Class size has also failed to improve education. " (Harmer, 76) The truth is that even the poorest of parents would be able to afford a private education with a school choice plan. (Harmer, 38) The image of the "criminally-underfunded" public school is false. It is true that the government would lose money by giving scholarships to students already attending private schools. The Wall Street Journal wrote that, "The California State Census Data Center, after analyzing the 1990 Census, found that about 18. Schools that participate can have no more than 49% of their students are scholarship receiving students. For the first time in the history of our country, the educational skills of one generation will not surpass, will not equal, will not even approach, those of their parents. However, 95 percent of Catholic schools, and 88 percent of Protestant schools charge tuition under $2,500 a year. (McGroarty, 21) It is plain to see that throwing more money at schools and calling it reform won't help the situation. Statewide in California, only 44 percent of the people employed by the school system are teachers. " (Harmer, 114) They already get a good education from government schools. (Harmer, 178) Opponents of school choice fear that children with special needs would be left out in the cold, since private schools would deny them admission. No students currently in private schools would benefit from school choice. " (Harmer, 25) In addition academic failure, public schools are failing to produce good citizens. These measures would prevent fraud and discrimination.
Common topics in this essay:
America Public,
Bill Kids,
Genetski Average,
Constitution United,
Switzerland Japan,
School Choice,
Data Center,
Polly Williams,
California Teachers,
Education Association,
school choice,
private schools,
public schools,
choice education,
school choice plan,
choice plan,
private school,
parental choice education,
parental choice,
government schools,
education school choice,
education initiative,
education school,
choice education initiative,
send children private,
|
Acceptance Essays
