Feedback Form
Quality
Research
Material!

Kafka

Kafka shows the nature of judgment through an explorer¡¯s experience in his short story, ¡°In the Penal Colony.¡± The explorer, invited to witness the execution of a disobedient soldier, is introduced to the machine that delivers death to the condemned man. The officer in charge of the execution is a fervent admirer of the machine, and as he enthusiastically explains how the machine functions in detail, he attempts to convince the explorer to support the old way of practicing the death penalty. However, the explorer disagrees with the officer because he finds that ¡°The injustice of the procedure and the inhumanity of the execution were undeniable¡± (151). Realizing his failure, the officer releases the condemned man and decides to punish himself with the machine, and both the officer and the machine perish in the end. Using contradictions among the relationships between the explorer and officer, officer and machine, and the old and new colony, Kafka argues that fair judgment cannot be accomplished by human power.

The explorer disapproves of the machine because its cruelty and distorted justice cannot be justified. The officer endeavors to explain every detail and function of the machine, trying to impress the explorer. H

. . .

is enthusiasm and devotion do impress the explorer, yet the explorer rather feels repulsed by the machine and the execution procedure. The officer describes the moment of enlightenment:

how quiet he grows at just about the sixth hour! Enlightenment comes to the most dull-witted. As a foreigner, the explorer feels unqualified to correct the injustice in other people¡¯s country. Extending this analogy, Kafka clearly states that there is no true judgment on earth as desmonstrated in the Penal Colony. In fact, the officer takes the explorer¡¯s opinion as a final judgment that the old tradition should retire.

Nonetheless, the explorer is conflicted by his position and by the struggle between the cultural changes in the colony. He sets the condemned man free and places himself in the death machine instead. However, he understands that the new colony will not perform true justice, either. This frustrating fact demonstrates the imperfection of the human nature. Moreover, he is never told about his conviction or his sentence at all. Nothing more happens than that the man begins to understand the inscription; he purses his mouth as if he were listening. Maybe the new commandant will punish his prisoners with physically more humane punishment; yet, with visible corruptions, justice is far away in the new colony still. The machine would not have a problem with writing ¡°HONOR THY SUPERIOR!¡± on the condemned man¡¯s body since the sentence is somewhat disassociated with its own characteristics (144). Indeed, the death of officer automatically means the death of the machine at the same time.

Approximate Word count = 1431
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA