Bomb Drop
Dropping the atom bomb Japan was amoral, nonsensical, and unnecessary. The decision to drop the atomic bomb was one which was rushed, and therefore, not fully analyzed to understand the repercussions that it would have. Even though it did successfully end World War II, it was not needed because the Japanese were without resources on their island due to the effective Ally sea blockade, and it was only a matter of time before they would surrender. The loss of some more soldiers' lives is a small expense compared to the damage that could be done by all the countries who now know of such a destructive weapon and are racing to create their own. Due to the speed at which the Manhattan project was rushed, the scientists were never able to fully test the long-term effects of such a powerful weapon. The scientists, who were obviously the most informed of the severity of this weapon, did not feel that the bomb should be dropped, and thought that it was effective enough as a deterrent. However, after spending two billion dollars on the Manhattan project, there was a sense
This is why "since the war a number of writers have asserted that America's true motives for using the atomic bomb were more anti-Soviet than anti-Japanese. " (The Agony of Atomic Scientists) This reason for dropping the bomb is completely immoral because it made Japan's civilians the guinea pigs for the bomb in order to convince congress to spend more money on research which can destroy the world. The United States was like a big brother to other countries and therefore should not have set an example making it appear okay to induce mass destruction. "It may be very difficult to persuade the world that a nation which was capable of secretly preparing and suddenly releasing a new weapon, as indiscriminate as the rocket bomb and a thousand times more destructive, is to be trusted in its proclaimed desire of having such weapons abolished by international agreement. Not only because of the masses of people that a nuclear bomb can kill, the long term after effects of it, but also the problems that it causes with nature. Shortly before Hames Byrnes became the Secretary of State, his view was that Russia would be more manageable if they knew that the United States possessed the atom bomb and if the United States demonstrated the bomb's power by dropping it on Japan. The scientists involved in the Manhattan Project agreed that "Within ten years other countries may have nuclear bombs, each of which weighing less than a ton, could destroy an urban area of more than ten square miles. that the bomb must be dropped to induce continual funding. After all, "How do you get congress to appropriate money for atomic energy research if you do not show results for the money which has been spent already. However, the United States felt that these consequences were less important than Russia controlling land in Japan if they were to aid the United States in the part of the war against Japan. It is morally incorrect to waste the lives of innocent Japanese civilians (including school children) in order to have more control over Russia. This would be a problem for the United States later because a communist Russia controlling large amounts of land in Eastern Europe, and also part of Japan, could lead to the same problem that started World War II; a communist quest for world domination. " Other countries creating atom bombs is a huge threat to civilization as a whole. " As one of the most supreme powers in the world, the United States should be obligated to create worldwide peace, not pioneer weapons for mass destruction.
Common topics in this essay:
Atomic Scientists,
II Japanese,
Manhattan Project,
Byrnes Secretary,
Decision Dropping,
War II,
Japan United,
Europe Japan,
atom bomb,
manhattan project,
World War,
atom bomb united,
powerful weapon,
world war,
bomb dropped,
mass destruction,
bomb united,
atomic bomb,
war ii,
destructive weapon,
world war ii,
|
Acceptance Essays
