Biogenetics
An article published on April 25, 1953 in the science journal Nature written by scientists James Watson and Francis Crick, modestly suggested a model for the structure and replication of the DNA (refer to picture 1), the face of science changed forever (Aldridge, 8). The evolution of technology has reached a point where it is capable of creating and modifying the DNA using Biogenetics Engineering. Although Biogenetics Engineering is becoming a more well known subject to the general public, there are definitely issues and uncertainties to be resolved. There are doubts about how safe Biogenetics Engineering is, and also how difficult it will be to control it. Furthermore, for the first time in the history of mankind, humans passed from the status of being created, to the status of being creators. In my opinion, Biogenetics is risky; however, it is already here and now the best solution is to try to control it. Biogenetics Engineering first took shape as experimentation into finding cures for diseases and the production of antibiotics. The process involves the ability to reproduce and modify the DNA. In one common method used, the desired molecules of DNA are removed from the donor organism and implanted into the genetic material,
Nevertheless, scientists defend themselves by showing several benefits of Biogenetics Engineering, such as the possibility of finding cures for diseases or solving the scarcity problem of organs used in transplants, and also creating an end for world famine. Another question that definitely has to be answered is whether there is an ethical difference between the ability to correct an abnormal organism and preventing one from occurring, even though the experiments' outcome may cause serious and unrecoverable damage. What would happen if a genetically engineered virus or bacteria escapes from the laboratory? This would be a virus, which our immune systems have never encountered before. On the other hand, StarLink was only meant for animal seed, yet it was detected in human food. There were many cases of allergic reactions in the United States, thus making the FDA intervene as soon as possible with the recall. The situation caused a huge turmoil with major importers of corn from the US, such as Japan. In theory this is a fantastic idea, there would be no more losses of corn plantations by pests. This is in fact, one of my best thoughts on the solution for controlling Biogenetics Engineering. The agency would have to see the theory first, so then it would decide whether or not it is safe for humanity or the global environment to allow the experiment to be made. Therefore, the United States should set as an example for other countries and once and for all stop the development of biological weapons. In fact, there are no activities that are risk-free, and if only controlling the activity can diminish this risk, it is worth facing it. An article from the Pure Food Campaign stated that Biogenetics Engineers will be creating thousands of new organisms over the next few years, and the result can seriously harm the biological environment. As I could perceive after my research, there are several strong arguments on both sides of the delicate issue relating Biogenetics Engineering.
Common topics in this essay:
Biogenetics Engineering,
Biotechnologies Genetics,
United FDA,
Scientific American,
Food Administration,
Richard Preston,
Treaty United,
Engineering Humanity,
Ron Epstein,
Doctor Steinbrecher,
biogenetics engineering,
biological weapons,
genetically engineered,
allergic reactions,
cause serious,
plastic surgery,
refer picture,
reactions people,
allergic reactions people,
spare organs,
engineering benefit humanity,
pure food campaign,
cause serious damage,
biogenetic material,
weapons defensive purposes,
|
Acceptance Essays
