Feedback Form
Quality
Research
Material!

Obediance to authority

Obedience to authority is necessary for any society to function. The point, at which obedience to authority becomes dangerous, is when it harms other citizens. One should obey authority, when it is empowered by the society, through rules enacted by society. Following this policy, society can prevent chaos.

Obedience to prevent chaos is part of our everyday routine. For example, obedience when driving is necessary. When officers give orders in traffic situations, obedience is critical for traffic to flow, thus citizens to get around towns, to work and pay taxes. If people overran 1 or 2 officers, there is no way to stop herds of people making a run for it. An example, showing the need for obedience is rioting. How could you go to work and pay taxes in this state of Chaos? Since people do not generally riot, societal order is maintained. If society rioted and our armed guard could not stop the chaos, society would cease to function.

Obedience is also enforced due to overwhelming majorities. Luckily, the greater percentage of people in a society would condone stealing, murder

. . .

Iraq is yet another example of obedience to authority. An example is Libya, a once prosperous country, because of Firestone buying Libya’s land for rubber crops. For example, what if people were to act on whims, such as lack of money or passion? They would suffer consequences, because the majority of society backs up the laws they enacted, with the support of their police forces.

People must have obedience to authority when it is for the better good of a society. This is exemplified through milgram’s experiment, where a person shocked the “subject”, because he or she felt they were just doing what they were told, thus avoiding responsibility. When a human of power abuses his or her power, to their benefit, the sequential humans following orders can reap havoc upon the society. Many examples have shown up in history over the years.

Any successful society follows these orders of obedience. In closing, surrendering your autonomy to the state is good, when it benefits the state and fighting against the state, when the state harms the society. When it came time for re-elections, push came to shove; Libya’s leader forced his re-election through intimidation and ballot stuffing. Thus, individuals use better judgment and those who do not, suffer the consequences. The chain of command dilutes this responsibility, because there is more than one person carrying out these orders, hence using the excuse, “I was just following orders”. This “benefit” has lead to the death and starvation of many and possibly lead to the start of world war III. His military followed orders, because he paid them money, which the regular citizens could not earn, due to his gluttonous control of Libya’s society.

Approximate Word count = 744
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA