Subjects:
All three readings discuss different aspects of neighbours and the connection between them, but the universal question that seemed to be attempted to be answered by all was what the causes of changes in neighbourly interaction were.
Young and Willmott’s classic study was conducted from 1953 to 1955 by taking a selection of working class families and residents from a borough in East London, Bethnal Green, and moved them to a new estate on the outer fringes of London, Greenleigh, to see how they interacted with their neighbours. Intriguing results ensued, which deserve further discussion. (They stated that they were not exp
. . .
The main subject that Young and Wilmott address is the wider family as ‘kinship networks’ and how strong it is in the inner city. Young and Wilmott noticed that at Greenleigh, there was a challenge to live the life that their new house suggests. It seems from Young and Wilmott’s, Richards’ and Peel’s studies that a neighbourhood could be a substitute for kinship or large family ties. It then becomes a competition as they watch each others home to have and do what the neighbours do but better. The older have been through all of this earlier in their lives and want to settle down in privacy and not be disturbed.
An interesting point that Young and Wilmott discussed was that all the residents’ complaints about their neighbours shared the attitude they complained of. As such, they were very different communities to start with. It can’t be expected for residents of a new neighbourhood to make good neighbourly connections straight away, but if careful and proficient plan and design are applied, a pleasurable private and public community life will follow. I thought from this observation that it seems like that will bring similarities to the new community and it could be building block for a stronger community in the future.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.