Why We Should Clone
Is there a consensus on the morality of cloning, human or otherwise? This hotly debated question raises many eyebrows when this sensitive subject is brought up. Through the mess of scientific support and religious opposition, as well as moral and ethical dilemmas, one thing remains the same; cloning is not yet safe enough to use on humans. Although, when it is, the benefits that result will greatly outweigh the risks and provide so much potential for the betterment of life. With proper legislation to control it, cloning on all levels, once it becomes safe and effective, should be allowed in the United States. No one knew much about the scientific world of cloning until 1997, when Scottish scientists cloned the first animal, a sheep named Dolly. Cloning basically means the copying of genetic material in one of two ways; blastomere separation or somatic cell nuclear transfer. With blastomere separation, the embryo is split soon after fertilization, and the resulting organisms are identical twins. This type of cloning can happen naturally or scientifically, resulting in multiple births. On the other hand, somatic cell nuclear transfer can only happen in a lab. In this process, scientists empty the nucleus of an adult egg
One law that must be enforced if cloning is made legal in the United States, is that "human clones should be declared to have the same legal rights and responsibilities as any other human being. The laws regarding income tax have shown people that it is a necessary evil in order to keep this country running smoothly. Another important law that must be implemented is that human clones should only be implanted and carried to term by a voluntary mother. Although it was controversial and hotly debated at the time of its inception, proper laws and enforcement have regulated it and kept it under control. People will not be able to keep a human clone in the wine cellar for spare body parts any more than they can an identical twin" (Vere, 5). Already this decision has been strongly criticized, bioethic critics are calling it "barbaric human experimentation" (CNNews. The democratic bill, introduced by Senators Feinstien and Kennedy " puts a moratorium on the implantation of a cloned embryo into a woman's uterus for ten years, and relies on periodic review of the issue by the National Bioethics Committee" (Coghlan), or more simply, bans the impregnation of a women with a cloned embryo for 10 years pending frequent reviews by the National Bioethics Committee. Income tax, with its controversy on whether or not it was right to impose a mandatory tax on the people, is one of those examples. In the United States, human cloning has progressed rather rapidly, but is continually facing controversy and debate. Although cloning has been a major scientific advance, it has not been without its drawbacks. Thus far, human embryos have been cloned successfully, although the embryos did not live past a few hours. Vere cautions us to remember that cloning isn't the same as genetic engineering.
Common topics in this essay:
Ethan Hawke,
Cell Technologies,
CellNEWS Sheep,
Catholic Church,
CellNEWS Dolly,
Steven Vere,
,
Dolly Cloning,
God Kass,
Las Vegas,
human cloning,
human dignity,
cloned embryos,
somatic cell nuclear,
cell nuclear,
somatic cell,
vere 3,
human clones,
nuclear transfer,
proper legislation,
genetic material,
cell nuclear transfer,
national bioethics committee,
bill introduced senators,
advanced cell technologies,
|
Acceptance Essays
