Civil War, Causes
There was nothing 'civil' about the Civil War. Neighbor fought neighbor and brother fought brother in a painful division between family and friends that mirrored the one between the North and the South. The Civil War started when between the Northern states (the Union) and the Southern states that seceded from the Union and formed the Confederacy. During the 19th century the South remained almost completely agricultural, with an economy and a social order largely founded on slavery and the plantation system. These equally dependent institutions produced the essential, especially cotton, from which the South derived its wealth. The North had its own great agricultural resources, was always more advanced commercially, and was also expanding industrially. Hostility between the two sections grew clearly after 1820, the year of the Missouri Compromise , which was intended as a permanent solution to the issue in which that hostility was most clearly expressed the question of the extension or prohibition of slavery in the federal territories of the West. During the year 1820 through 1821, procedures passed by the U.S. Congress to end the first of a series of crises concerning the extension of slavery. By 1818, Missouri Territo
It was, however, permanently bound to the bitter sectional controversy over the extension of slavery into the territories and was further complicated by conflict over the location of the projected transcontinental railroad . The result was the tragedy of "bleeding" Kansas. Breckinridge, and John Bell was the signal for the secession of the Southern states. The two bills were joined as one in the Senate, with the clause forbidding slavery in Missouri replaced by a measure prohibiting slavery in the remainder of the Louisiana Purchase north of 3630N latitude. Indeed, an amendment was added specifically repealing that compromise. Four attempts to organize a single territory for this area had already been defeated in Congress, largely because of Southern opposition to the Missouri Compromise . The obvious conclusion at least to Missourians was that the first would be slave, the second free. Although the last of these attempts to organize the area had nearly been successful, Stephen A. By 1854 the organization of the huge Platte and Kansas river countries west of Iowa and Missouri was overdue. The bitterness of the debates sharply emphasized the sectional division of the United States. ry had gained sufficient population to warrant its admission into the Union as a state. They were successful in the elections of 1858 and passed over their better-known leaders to nominate Abraham Lincoln in 1860. Congress established the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. The popular sovereignty provision caused both proslavery and antislavery forces to organize strength and put forth full pressure to determine the "popular" decision in Kansas in their own favor, using groups such as the Emigrant Aid Company.
Common topics in this essay:
Union Southern,
South Douglas's,
Douglas Illinois,
Missouri Compromise,
Maine Missouri,
Whigs Republican,
Iowa Missouri,
Pierce Southerners,
Abraham Lincoln,
United January,
missouri compromise,
civil war,
republican party,
kansas-nebraska act,
territories kansas nebraska,
slave free,
maine missouri,
passed house,
extension slavery,
sectional division,
territories kansas,
|
Acceptance Essays
