Terrorism
Since the events of 11 September 2001, terrorism has moved higher on the list of world priorities from a global perspective. Many governments have passed internal legislation to help combat terrorism within their own boundaries. Alliances with other governments have been formed to help eradicate international terrorism outside their borders. The U.S. has taken the lead in this endeavor but it has taken the support of a majority of the worlds' nations to make this temporary coalition work. Now is the time to make this coalition a permanent international counter-terrorist organization to combat state-sponsored terrorism. This international organization would consist of two branches: the diplomatic branch and the military branch. The world is now ready to implement such an organization. The following statements from heads of state show proof of a need for an international organization to combat terrorism. Tony Blair, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, in the Introduction of "Campaign Against Terrorism" states, "What we now have to face is the fact that there are irresponsible states who either have, or are actively seeking, biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. This is the threat which President Bush ri
The intelligence section would provide the liaison between the Unit and other forces. In addition, terrorist organizations may benefit from the lack of international cooperation by simply going for softer targets-in this case targets in nations with less experience in dealing with terrorist activities. " But in turning a blind eye on terrorist activity, so long as their own interests are not affected, these nations by their refusal to take a stand inadvertently provide the soil in which international terrorism can grow and flourish. Military measures thus become just one part of a jigsaw of operations to deter, counter, disrupt and destroy terrorist threats. Tactics and/or techniques must be adapted to new technical equipment or intelligence information. Research projects and links to academic research organizations would also be a task of the intelligence branch. Those terrorist organizations with no state support could be and would be identified and eliminated by the military side of the international counter-terrorism organization at some time in the future. State-sponsored organizations are those terrorist groups with which there is documented proof of some association with or support from one or more nations. It is a tragic mistake, often made by nations not currently under attack by terrorists, to underestimate the threat to their own interests. And if we continue to allow these states to obtain and develop these weapons, we may find out too late their potential for destruction. The military and the civil power are becoming intertwined as never before in common security purposes. Massive increases in defense spending are going to be required to finance the new technology and reshape armed forces for their instant homeland and global roles. The battle for national security must now be fought both at home and away, and simultaneously. To determine the punishment to be inflicted on these states that sponsor terrorism, there is a need for an international organization to determine the amount of involvement of the state.
Common topics in this essay:
Counter-Terrorist Unit,
Special Forces,
Britain Japan,
Institute Counter-Terrorism,
Boaz Ganor,
,
International Unit,
Defense Minister+,
Koizumi Japan,
Union Address,
terrorist organizations,
international counter-terrorist,
counter-terrorist unit,
international community,
international counter-terrorist unit,
international organization,
international cooperation,
intelligence branch,
counter terrorist,
armed forces,
terrorist attacks,
direct involvement terrorist,
terrorism international organization,
counter terrorist units,
involvement terrorist attacks,
|