Cure for Cancer
Two proposals have been presented concerning the issue of gene therapy. The first was a proposal to treat cancer. With the p53 gene being recognized as a tumor suppressor, by manually inserting the p53 gene into different parts of the body, it can potentially "cure" lung cancer by prevention. I would agree with this gene therapy basically because if this gene therapy worked, the consequences and potential for the greater good of the community would be increased immensely. I first warn you, however, that what I am about to say is entirely theoretical. I believe that if the inhalation of the p53 gene into the lungs preventing lung cancer works, a window of economic opportunity would show itself. Here's how it would turn out: Supposedly that this new gene therapy would work, it could be anticipated that there would be an increase in smokers and a higher demand in tobacco and cigarettes. With this higher demand, the prices would go up for cigarettes. With more and more money flowing into these tobacco businesses, the government can tax high
With this extra money, investments in research in the cures for other diseases or from city projects can be started. Not only would this create disturbance in the Jewish populations, but also the "pro-life" activists. Some religions also would not agree with gematic gene therapy. The counter-arguments for this would be as follows: lifestyle would dictate how these people who are addicted to the nicotine in the cigarettes. If this is not realized and the fertilized egg is nurtured to being born, other genetic problems could occur which would lead to a life of suffering and pain. However, again, only a minority of the population can afford this treatment and there is no guarantee that lung cancer will be a distant memory. By using in vitro fertilization and tampering with the genome by adding the tumor suppressant gene, mistakes can occur which would lead to trashing the fertilized egg. The second proposal, however, I would lean towards rejecting the idea of tampering with the germatic gene therapy. By making this choice, it would interfere with "natural selection" and "survival of the fitness. Only the people can afford this gene therapy would have the pleasure to not worry as much about their health lifestyles, which would inevitably create a large hole in the social hierarchy. Stem cell research would be related to this decision whether to apply germatic gene therapy on embryos or not. On the contrary, the way we live and the way we view our bodies will be altered dramatically. With a new market for the economy, my proposal would help take the stress off of the people's taxes and the government could tax these tobacco corporations often and more liberally. Generally speaking, the orthodox Jewish would not agree with this because, to them, it would be creating a "perfect race", just as Hitler attempted to do in World War II.
Common topics in this essay:
War II,
Here's Supposedly,
THERAPY PROPOSALS,
gene therapy,
germatic gene therapy,
germatic gene,
lung cancer,
p53 gene,
gene therapy feel,
therapy feel,
fertilized egg,
government tax,
occur lead,
|
Acceptance Essays
