Life or Death: Who Chooses?
In Roman times, abortion and the destruction of unwantedchildren was permissible, but as out civilization has aged, itseems that such acts were no longer acceptable by rational humanbeings, so that in 1948, Canada along with most other nations inthe world signed a declaration of the United Nations promisingevery human being the right to life. The World MedicalAssociation meeting in Geneve at the same time, stated that theutmost respect for human life was to be from the moment ofconception. This declaration was re-affirmed when the WorldMedical Association met in Oslo in 1970. Should we go backwardsin our concern for the life of an individual human being? The unborn human is still a human life and not all thewishful thinking of those advocating repeal of abortion laws, canalter this. Those of us who would seek to protect the human whois still to small to cry aloud for it's own protection, have beenaccused of having a 19th Century approach to life in the lastthird of the 20th Century. But who in reality is using argumentsof a bygone Century? It is an incontrovertible fact of biologicalscience - Make no Mistake - that from the moment of conception, a
According to the Wyn report with statistics from 12counties, women who have a previous induced abortion have theirability to bear children in the future permanently impaired. Rape is a detestable crime, but nosane reasoning can place the slightest blame on the unborn childit might produce. We have been told by the media thatthe majority of Canadians wish to have abortion legalized but thelatest census taken by the Toronto Star in March of 1989 reportsthat 35% of those polled thought that abortion was already easyto obtain, 26% thought it too hard, 19% about right and 21% hadno opinion. Can we choose death foranother while life is all we ourselves know? Methods are beingdeveloped to diagnose certain defects in the infants of mothersat risk before the infant is born. No, repealing the abortion law does notmake it possible for every women to safely eliminate, what is forher, an unwanted pregnancy. Should we reallyleave the right to hijack as a personal decision only? Those campaigning for further liberalization of the abortionlaw, hope to make abortion available and safe for all who wish itduring a pregnancy. InCanada as reported in the Canadian Medical Association Journal(the Statistics from Statistics Canada), the complication rateand this being for immediate complications of early abortion is4. Abortion on demand a women's right to choose not to continuean unplanned pregnancy would prevent there being unwantedchildren in this country, so we are told. It is apermissive and frightened society that does not develop theexpertise to control population, civil disorder, crime, poverty,even its own sexuality but yet would mount an uncontrolled,repeat uncontrolled, destructive attack on the defenceless, verybeginnings of life. Nobody here or inCanada, wants there to be unwanted children in this city, and inthis country, and also in this world. His whole heritage is forever fixed. Patients now go into the office through the front doorinstead of the rear. He swims, he grasps apointer, he moves freely, he excretes urine. Those seeking repeal of the present abortion law willrapidly point out that nevertheless, it is safer to have a legalabortion than illegal abortions, safer for the women that is.
Common topics in this essay:
Association President,
Medical Association,
According Wyn,
Edwin Connow,
Dr Guttmacher,
Dear Birthright,
United Kingdom,
Britain Abortion,
Attorney's Office,
Organization Serious,
human life,
life death,
unborn child,
medical association,
unwanted children,
abortion laws,
unwanted child,
repeal abortion,
weeks pregnancy,
pregnant women,
death unborn child,
becoming unwanted child,
canadian medical association,
it's own protection,
13 weeks pregnancy,
|
Acceptance Essays
