Feedback Form
Quality
Research
Material!

Life or Death: Who Chooses?

In Roman times, abortion and the destruction of unwanted

children was permissible, but as out civilization has aged, it

seems that such acts were no longer acceptable by rational human

beings, so that in 1948, Canada along with most other nations in

the world signed a declaration of the United Nations promising

every human being the right to life. The World Medical

Association meeting in Geneve at the same time, stated that the

utmost respect for human life was to be from the moment of

conception. This declaration was re-affirmed when the World

Medical Association met in Oslo in 1970. Should we go backwards

in our concern for the life of an individual human being?

The unborn human is still a human life and not all the

wishful thinking of those advocating repeal of abortion laws, can

alter this. Those of us who would seek to protect the human who

is still to small to cry aloud for it's own protection, have been

accused of having a 19th Century approach to life in the last

third of the 20th Century. But who in reality is using arguments

of a bygone Century? It is an incontrovertible fact of biological

science - Make no Mistake - that from the moment of conception, a

. . .

According to the Wyn report with statistics from 12

counties, women who have a previous induced abortion have their

ability to bear children in the future permanently impaired. Rape is a detestable crime, but no

sane reasoning can place the slightest blame on the unborn child

it might produce. We have been told by the media that

the majority of Canadians wish to have abortion legalized but the

latest census taken by the Toronto Star in March of 1989 reports

that 35% of those polled thought that abortion was already easy

to obtain, 26% thought it too hard, 19% about right and 21% had

no opinion. Can we choose death for

another while life is all we ourselves know? Methods are being

developed to diagnose certain defects in the infants of mothers

at risk before the infant is born. No, repealing the abortion law does not

make it possible for every women to safely eliminate, what is for

her, an unwanted pregnancy. Should we really

leave the right to hijack as a personal decision only?

Those campaigning for further liberalization of the abortion

law, hope to make abortion available and safe for all who wish it

during a pregnancy. In

Canada as reported in the Canadian Medical Association Journal

(the Statistics from Statistics Canada), the complication rate

and this being for immediate complications of early abortion is

4.

Abortion on demand a women's right to choose not to continue

an unplanned pregnancy would prevent there being unwanted

children in this country, so we are told. It is a

permissive and frightened society that does not develop the

expertise to control population, civil disorder, crime, poverty,

even its own sexuality but yet would mount an uncontrolled,

repeat uncontrolled, destructive attack on the defenceless, very

beginnings of life. Nobody here or in

Canada, wants there to be unwanted children in this city, and in

this country, and also in this world. His whole heritage is forever fixed.

Patients now go into the office through the front door

instead of the rear. He swims, he grasps a

pointer, he moves freely, he excretes urine.

Those seeking repeal of the present abortion law will

rapidly point out that nevertheless, it is safer to have a legal

abortion than illegal abortions, safer for the women that is.

Approximate Word count = 4439
Approximate Pages = 18 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA