Comparative Analytical Essay: Benjamin Disraeli
Benjamin Disraeli was a politically engaged man. He was a Member of Parliament, Chancellor of the Exchequer, which is relatively like the United States' Secretary of the Treasury, and was twice the Prime Minister of Great Britain. Unlike many politicos of his day, however, Disraeli was heavily involved in issues of the common man of Victorian England, such as expanding suffrage to all taxpaying men, improving health facilities and practices, housing, trade unions, but most importantly, humanizing the working and living conditions of the lower-class in England. He addressed these issues with not only governmental involvement; Disraeli was a professional writer as well. He wrote both romantically and realistically, and molded public opinion with Cybil and Conigsby as much as he did with any legislation. The philosophies of this man are multifaceted, and his political experience combined with his influential literature give him no precise contemporary. However, there were many intellectuals of his time with whom he concurred and deterred about prevailing matters within Victorian England. There is the aspect of Disraeli's actual writing style that could be considered superficially insignificant, but is, in fact, a quite important fe
His philosophy on government and his actual writing style are both extremely intriguing. This was because, while proclaiming absolute monarchy as the best form or government, Carlyle judged the aristocracy contemptuously. Additionally, in his literature, he speaks simply of the "two nations. He calls them "the most miraculous of all things man has devised (449). Carlyle believed that the common man needs a strong and ruthless ruler, and that those people should obey him at all times. He was a correspondent in Parliament as a young man, which gave him a direct, unsightly vision of the cynical mindset of Members of Parliament. Carlyle eventually came to the point where he considered the democratic system to be horrid, and considered a strong, strict government to be an absolute necessity. Dickens did not have faith in politics. Thomas Carlyle had a similar mindset about the lack of trustworthiness in the common man. But Carlyle also disagreed with Disraeli about the aristocracy. However, Carlyle was much more radical, and did not share similar views with Disraeli about the necessity of democracy. As he said in an 1835 address, "My faith in the people governing is, on the whole, infinitesimal; my faith in The People governed, is, on the whole, illimitable''. He believed as Disraeli did in that Carlyle's ideal government would be one in which the common man has no right to be heard.
Common topics in this essay:
Thomas Carlyle,
Victorian England,
Dickens Dickens,
Disraeli Carlyle,
Charles Dickens,
Twist Disraeli,
Disraeli's Tory,
Benjamin Disraeli,
British History,
Dickens Disraeli,
victorian england,
charles dickens,
benjamin disraeli,
thomas carlyle,
writing style,
actual writing style,
carlyle believed,
living conditions,
actual writing,
addressed issues,
faith people,
|
Acceptance Essays
