Feedback Form

Get immediate access to thousands of

 high quality papers and essays.
Mega Essays Home  |   Questions?  |   Acceptable Use  |   Customer Care  |   Site Search
    Enter Essay Topic:

   

    Subjects:
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology

    Login:
Member Login
Join Now!
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

In-Vitro Fertilization - A thought paper

I see no problem with in vitro fertilization when used to circumvent the inability to create children. Likewise, using selective breeding to reduce the chances of disease is also a very noble thing to do. One could argue that it would be immoral to not perform such actions if one has the means to do so.

The initial differences between natural fertilization and in vitro fertilization are minimal at best. Embryos are normally created in the uterus of a female after a sporadic chain of events involving the interaction of sperm with eggs. In contract, IVF is very much the same process of sperm/egg interaction but the physician simply chooses what sperm gets to interact with which egg. Within these confines, most major religions and ideologies accept IVF as an acce

. . .
Mass production of embryos made solely for research might put their rights in deep jeopardy. Until the embryo reaches a point of consciousness (not to be mistaken with self-consciousness because some animals exhibit that characteristic and unjustifiably are made to suffer in scientific research), there is really nothing we can do to the embryo which causes harm to it.

On the other hand, I completely understand the other side of this debacle. A possible problem with selective breeding is the possible cheapening of human life. It’s a proposition that has the potential for severe misuse. This is where I see John Singer’s logic most fitting. And hence, why I believe it is moral to discard the embryos that will not be used. The actual process of human creation is still innately natural. Since this guarantees that there will be more than embryo that will form, there is an issue of what to do with the “other” embryos that aren’t deemed fit to be implanted into the uterus of the female. Embryos will no longer be seen as a fragile and rare opportunity to further science (and likewise be treated in a conscientious way); they will run the risk of being viewed as interchangeable parts in a large factory of human body creation. In the 14 days of fertilization, embryos are not susceptible to pain because their cells are undifferentiated. Since in vitro fertilization is expensive, time-consuming, and physically arduous to a female, multiple eggs have to be removed to ensure successful fertilization in the fewest number of procedures. We definitely can’t afford this possible avenue so I believe we must limit our research on “spare” embryos from in vitro fertilization procedures which would have been destroyed anyways.

So in conclusion, while I believe IVF is very beneficial when used to create embryos, it has to be tempered with the utmost care.

Common topics in this essay:
John Singers, , vitro fertilization, fertilization vitro fertilization, uterus female, fertilization vitro, selective breeding,

See the rest of the paper. Join Now!

Approximate Word count = 519
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here

Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900



CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE



Get immediate access to over 100,000
high quality term papers and essays!!!

Webmasters make $$$!



All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC
All rights reserved. DMCA NEW