Kent State
In trying to unravel what happened at Kent State on May 4, 1970, we must determine whether or not the National Guard faced a serious danger from the student crowd. Kent State suffered a big tragedy in May 4th, 1970. Four students were killed and 9 were injured cause of a confrontation between the National Guard and a group of students. The National Guard had great advantage because they had powerful weapons and the students had none ex
The following is part of a statement made by General Robert Canterbury, Assistant Adjutant General of the Ohio National Guard; ". cept for rocks It is more than obvious that the National Guard did not face serious danger at any moment. " In this person's point of view the firing was justified but a member of the National Guard that was also there contradicts his statement. There's many other ways, which they could have used to control the crowd. It was impossible for them to get hurt or harmed in any way by rocks when they were about 100 yards away. I told them I would tell the truth and couldn't get in trouble that way. Innocent people died and many other were hurt, both physically and emotionally. " Even though most people were on the National Guard's side it is more than clear that the firing can't be justified. The guys have been saying that we got to get together and stick to the same story, that it was our lives or them, a matter of survival. "No, I didn't think they'd try to take our rifles, not while we could use the bayonets and butts.
Common topics in this essay:
National Guard,
National Guard's,
,
national guard,
serious danger,
|
Acceptance Essays
