Sweatshops
Sweaty Consciousness: The Students Against Sweatshop Movement SAS not SDS is a new acronym for a new generation of student activists. "Students Against Sweatshops" may not have yet received the same attention as their "Students for a Democratic Society" predecessors, but they have been noticed: "While in the sixties the civil rights movement and the Vietnam War infused the student movement with a keen awareness of racial oppression and the excesses of the state and its military machine, the new radicals of the nineties are starting out where the sixties left off: with a probing critique of the economic system, informed by an understanding of its gender and racial dimensions." A vast network of Student Against Sweatshops organization have been cultivating on campuses across North America, and have received support and inspiration from other anti-sweatshop groups and labour organizations. Their primary goal is calling upon on College and University administrations to regulate their lucrative business partnerships with code of conducts, in order to improve the sweatshop conditions of factories making University apparel. These code of conducts provide enforceable standards for wages, working hours, h
Students Against Sweatshops at U of T conducted a nine-day sit-in at President Pritchards office to force administration to implement a code of conduct for university apparel suppliers and trademark licensors. Yet, since this framework is not laid out concretely in the code, the compliance measures could possibly be inconsistent, arguable, therefore, ineffective. Through a series of small, unregistered contractor and sub-contractors, "jobbers" will often employ homeworkers. Companies' claim is that this is "proprietary information", and disclosing it would lessen their competitive edge. A 1999 study revealed that interviewed homeworkers were being paid between $6. Research entails examining labels in stores, asking questions of sales staff, studying annual corporate reports, searching the internet, and giving logos to workers to identify. In light of these various factors, I believe Students Against Sweatshop movements will have little impact on the increasing global phenomenon of sweatshops. This is what a student movement could be. " This entire discussion essentially explored the question: "How does capitalism work and what should we do to combat it, and has this been successful?" The "has this been successful" part always seems to be riddled with uncertainty and contradictions, when acts to change the world are explored. " They point out that deregulation - which allowed the apparel industry to globalize in the first place - has also provided conditions for a new wave of non-unionized workplaces to establish themselves in developed nations like Canada. The logo is a new form of power that circulates through our very being. It is believed that enforcing the practice of a "living wage", with the resulting increase in production cost, will only decrease incentive for companies to locate their factories in the developing world. Governments are either unable or unwilling to ensure the right of collective bargaining between workers and management, or are outwardly repressive of independent unions.
Common topics in this essay:
David Moberg,
Columbia University,
Indonesia Philippines,
Environmental Standards,
Solidarity Network,
Gap Wal-mart,
Eric Brakken,
Students Sweatshop,
Students Sweatshops,
United Unions,
code conducts,
students sweatshops,
code conduct,
proposed code,
public disclosure,
university apparel,
living wage,
social justice,
student movement,
students sweatshop,
maquila solidarity network,
implemented code canadian,
clear-cut solutions mean,
process implementing code,
code conduct university,
|