Society Should Ban the Use of animals in Cosmetic Testing
Every year, millions of animals suffer and die at the hands of scientists who perform outdated and inaccurate tests that prove no benefit to humans or animals whatsoever. Before these animals die, they are routinely burned, scalded, poisoned, starved, given electric shocks, addicted to drugs, subjected to near freezing temperatures, dosed with radioactive elements and driven insane. They are deliberately inflicted with diseases such as cancer, diabetes, oral infections, stomach ulcers, syphilis, herpes, and AIDS. Their eyes are surgically removed; their brains and spinal cords damaged, and their bones broken. The use of anesthesia is not mandated by law, and consequently, it is rarely administered. Cosmetics companies attempt to justify all of this cruelty by claiming that the tests are performed to determine the possible dangers of cosmetics for human use. Substances such as eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals, despite the fact that the test results do not help prevent or treat human illness or injury at all. Experimentation on live animals, or "vivisection" began as early as the 17th century. During that time period, Philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) rejected Philosopher
Like eye irritancy tests, lethal dose tests are unreliable and have too many variables to have a constant result. According to the companies that perform these tests maintain that they are done to establish the safety of a product and the ingredients. More drastic measures must be implemented if we are going to wipe out the suffering of animals at the hands of scientists and researchers. The problem that we are faced with today is not a difficult one to fix. Bentham's philosophy on animals was: "The question is not, can they reason? nor, can they talk?, but, can they suffer?" The practice of testing cosmetics on animals began in 1933, soon after a woman used Lash Lure mascara to darken her lashes. Cosmetics are not required to be tested on animals and since alternatives exist it is hard to understand why some companies continue to use these types of tests. More emphasis must be put on hard line tactics, and harsher penalties must be enforced for those who subject animals to any treatment that contravenes the global Animal Cruelty Act. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which regulates cosmetic products, does not require animal testing. 40-50% of the animals used in experiments come from companies who breed these animals for just this purpose. The test was developed in 1927 and the testing continues until at least fifty percent of the animals die (this usually takes 2-4 weeks). The Department of Agriculture inspects laboratories where animals are used and enforces federal laws regarding treatment and care of the animals. Just weeks ago, the European Union (EU) moved closer to an agreement that would enforce a ban on the use of animal testing to develop beauty products in the EU. The overall adult cancer rate has risen in the past 40 years and a fatal heart attack strikes a person every 45 seconds. The process involves placing chemicals on the animal's raw, shaved skin and covering the skin with adhesive plaster. The tests sometimes last between seven and eighteen days.
Common topics in this essay:
Administration FDA,
,
Act Sophisticated,
Disease Control,
Institutes Health,
European Parliament,
Cosmetic Act,
Rene Descartes',
Drug Administration,
Department Agriculture,
irritancy tests,
tested animals,
food drug,
animal testing,
drug administration,
animal welfare,
food drug administration,
eye irritancy tests,
skin irritancy,
eye irritancy,
national institutes health,
department agriculture,
acute toxicity tests,
lethal dose,
products tested animals,
|
Acceptance Essays
