China
The debatable one child policy of China has ultimately stirred many people's emotions and views on how to solve the population problem. Carroll Bogert et al are a fraction of those people whose viewpoint concerning the one child policy leans towards ending it, since it leads to human rights violations and physical abuse. Their article "Rethinking family Values" is mainly concerned with their views on how the one child policy affects orphans who are neglected primarily by their parents and then later by the government in order to rid China of its population problems. While on the other end of the stick Peng Peiyum's "One Family, One Child" argues that the one child policy, although a controversial subject, is however a method of benefiting society and stabilizing the global population. After reviewing the aforementioned articles thoroughly, it was obvious that Peng's article was much stronger than Bogert et al. As they lack strong factual evidence, clarity and implement contradictory points while Peng provides a stronger argument with strong supporting evidence. Bogert et al, though making a passionate effort to convey their views, they fail to provide a convincing piece of work. They argue that family planning leads to negle
Saying that may move someone's feelings however it doesn't provide any concrete evidence. And even though one might think that it is hurting the men of China, it's the women who have to carry the child, give birth and mostly raise them not the fathers. Not trying to undermine the father's role however it is a fact that women take a greater responsibility in taking care of the children. This weakens the article and makes it all the more confusing. He shows how "the sole objective of family planning in China is the continued improvement of our citizen's [China's citizens] material and culture lives" (Peiyun 1) and how its goal is also to "prevent genetic and birth defects" (Peiyun 1). Also, another factor that causes the reader to be reluctant to believe the authors is that they contradict them selves at the end of the piece, when they state that "many women in the countryside would rather have fewer children, but they're under intense pressure from husbands and mothers-in-law to produce babies," (Bogert 2), This means that women are happier with the one child policy since they do not have to get lots of kids and they have the government to support them with their decision. He states that "The very success of China's policies, however, is also creating new problems. 8 percent, thereby diminishing the rate of natural increase from 2. " And by stating the different sides of the argument, Peng is viewed as an honest writer and is therefore more appealing and convincing to the reader; this adds to the strength of Peng's article. The Chinese government's aim is to implement the Family Planning programs in order to slow down population growth since "Environmentalists and population experts argue about the degree . Bogert et al also believe that there are too many drawbacks to the family planning approach, including orphans, abandonment, and simply the defiance against the basic human right to produce children.
Common topics in this essay:
Family Child,
Family Planning,
Furthermore Peng's,
Communication Campaign,
Carroll Bogert,
Planning Commission,
China Peng's,
,
child policy,
family planning,
bogert et,
bogert et al,
et al,
peng's article,
peiyun 1,
family planning programs,
peiyun 2,
article provides,
family child,
family values,
rethinking family values,
child policy china,
|
Acceptance Essays
